Ploidacot/Triploid monocot: Difference between revisions
No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Triploid monocot notation is complicated as it conventionally requires either the introduction of new "1/3-pythagorean" ordinals or the use of scales other than the standard diatonic scale. As such, there is no universally accepted convention. Note and interval names are provided where triploid monocot intervals align with standard monocot intervals. | Triploid monocot notation is complicated as it conventionally requires either the introduction of new "1/3-pythagorean" ordinals or the use of scales other than the standard diatonic scale. As such, there is no universally accepted convention. Note and interval names are provided where triploid monocot intervals align with standard monocot intervals. | ||
While there is no agreed-upon notation system for triploid monocot, the following is based on interpreting the generator as a semitone (1/3 of a minor third), allowing for an ^ or v to stand for a 1/3 of of an ''inversed'' diminished second (equivalent to the [[Pythagorean comma]]), so vvC# and ^Db are enharmonic. | While there is no agreed-upon notation system for triploid monocot, the following is based on interpreting the generator as a semitone (1/3 of a minor third), allowing for an ^ or v to stand for a 1/3 of of an ''inversed'' diminished second (the difference between diatonic semitone and chromatic semitone, equivalent to the [[Pythagorean comma]]), so vvC# and ^Db are enharmonic. | ||
{| class="wikitable" | {| class="wikitable" | ||