Xenharmonic Wiki:Elections: Difference between revisions

Aura (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
BudjarnLambeth (talk | contribs)
Comments: reply
Line 37: Line 37:
===Comments===
===Comments===
The one and only problem I see so far is that if we don't have enough bureaucrats, Fred could be overloaded- especially since he seems to be so busy as is- so we need to nominate at least one to two more bureaucrats. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 05:29, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
The one and only problem I see so far is that if we don't have enough bureaucrats, Fred could be overloaded- especially since he seems to be so busy as is- so we need to nominate at least one to two more bureaucrats. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 05:29, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
: Hi Aura,
: This is a fair concern; I think promoting Fred is the best first step for addressing it.
: Once Fred is promoted, there will be 3 active bureaucrats instead of 2: Tyler, FloraC and Fred.
: If someone else were to become a bureaucrat, it would probably make sense for them to be a regular admin for a year or so first (as was the case with Flora and Fred).
: Here is the list of current admins: [[Xenharmonic Wiki:Administrators#Current administrators]]. On that list, aside from Fred, I don't see anyone who is both active enough and non-controversial enough to be an ideal candidate for bureaucrat.
: As such, I think it might make some sense to nominate more new admins; and maybe a year or two down the line if things are going well, they might be nominated as full bureaucrats. I think that Ganaram Inukshuk, Sintel and/or Xenoindex would be good choices (only if they themselves were okay with being nominated though of course; we'd need to ask them individually first).
: Are there any of those suggestions you agree or disagree with? Any other names you think it might be a good idea to nominate?
: --[[User:BudjarnLambeth|BudjarnLambeth]] ([[User talk:BudjarnLambeth|talk]]) 01:08, 28 October 2025 (UTC)