Talk:Meantone family: Difference between revisions
| Line 128: | Line 128: | ||
: Yes please! – [[User:Sintel|Sintel🎏]] ([[User_talk:Sintel|talk]]) 18:08, 22 August 2025 (UTC) | : Yes please! – [[User:Sintel|Sintel🎏]] ([[User_talk:Sintel|talk]]) 18:08, 22 August 2025 (UTC) | ||
: My thoughts on the matter, copied from the XA discord: | |||
: > flattone -> hypnotone -> vincenzo (current 13-limit flattone) | |||
: > sept meantone -> meanpop -> meanpop -> meantonic (current 19-limit meanpoppic) | |||
: > sept meantone -> huygens -> grosstone -> huygens (current 19-limit grosstone) | |||
: > or | |||
: > sept meantone -> huygens -> grosstone -> roulette | |||
: > sept meantone -> huygens -> grosstone -> mediantone | |||
: > sept meantone -> huygens -> meridetone -> huygens (current 19-limit sauveuric) | |||
: covers all subranges between 26edo and 12edo with 6 extension pathways. Note that the roulette (31 & 74) and mediantone (74 & 43) extensions to grosstone are very complex ''and not currently documented on the page''. | |||
: I believe furthermore that 11-limit "meanenneadecal" should be renamed to "vincenzo", and that tridecimal meantone should be decanonicalized (also that 11-limit huygens should be called huygens and not "undecimal meantone"). I don't believe any pathways extending from either flattone or septimal meantone to the 19-limit, other than these 8, are worth preserving. --[[User:Lériendil|Lériendil]] ([[User talk:Lériendil|talk]]) 06:33, 24 August 2025 (UTC) | |||