S-expression/Advanced results: Difference between revisions

Lériendil (talk | contribs)
m added breadcrumb
Lériendil (talk | contribs)
mNo edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:


== Using S-factorizations to understand the significance of S-expressions ==
== Using S-factorizations to understand the significance of S-expressions ==
This section deals with the forms of the main infinite comma families listed on this page* as expressed in terms of nearby harmonics in the harmonic series and as related to square-particulars; note that this uses a mathematical notation of [a, b, c, ...]^[x, y, z, ...] to denote a^x * b^y * c^z * ...
This section deals with the forms of the main infinite comma families listed on the main [[S-expression]] page as expressed in terms of nearby harmonics in the harmonic series and as related to square-particulars; note that this uses a mathematical notation of [a, b, c, ...]^[x, y, z, ...] to denote a^x * b^y * c^z * ...
 
<nowiki>*</nowiki> except [[lopsided comma]]s which are dealt with in their respective subsection of the page (which is conveniently just under this section, partly as it demonstrates a less easy application of this technique).


If instead of working through things algebraically we look at square-particulars as describing a relationship between adjacent harmonics, we can use this to understand why certain simplifications and equivalences exist in a way that is equivalent to the sometimes harder-to-understand usual algebraic form:
If instead of working through things algebraically we look at square-particulars as describing a relationship between adjacent harmonics, we can use this to understand why certain simplifications and equivalences exist in a way that is equivalent to the sometimes harder-to-understand usual algebraic form: