Talk:17L 2s: Difference between revisions
→Proposed text to add to introduction section (revised): Have already found 1 case of needing 2.3♯.3♭.5 |
→Proposed text to add to introduction section (revised): Attempt to improve wording |
||
| Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
==== Proposed text to add to introduction section (revised) ==== | ==== Proposed text to add to introduction section (revised) ==== | ||
From a regular temperament theory perspective, this scale is notable for corresponding to the mega chromatic scale of the [[Alphatricot family]] temperaments. Unfortunately, its generator does not have a convenient rational representation — the simple ratios [[23/16]] and even [[36/25]] are off-scale flat, while the simple ratio [[13/9]] is off-scale sharp. The Alphatricot family uses ~[[59049/40960]] as a generator. | From a regular temperament theory perspective, this scale is notable for corresponding to the mega chromatic scale of the [[Alphatricot family]] temperaments. Unfortunately, its generator does not have a convenient rational representation — the simple ratios [[23/16]] and even [[36/25]] are off-scale flat, while the simple ratio [[13/9]] is off-scale sharp. The Alphatricot family uses ~[[59049/40960]] as a generator. A pitfall of the use of compound harmonics and subharmonics in a generator is that they multiply the effect of shifts in mapping of their respective primes with scale hardness — for instance, 59049/40960 only maps correctly within a narrow range close to step ratio 10:3, while the comparitively simple 36/25 that is just barely off-scale flat (being near just in the equalized endpoint [[19edo]]) fails to map correctly even for several EDOs close to the soft end of the scale's tuning spectrum; the even simpler 13/9 (off-scale sharp) is likewise affected. Using such generators outside of a narrow set of EDos depends upon direct approximation of a harmonic and/or subharmonic. This is awkward when one also needs to use a component harmonic as specified in the patent vals of the EDOs, thus requiring the use of nonstandard conditional subgroup temperaments such as 2.3♯.3♭.5 or 2.3.5♯.5♭ (or 2.3.9.5 or 2.3.5.25) including a rule on when to use the direct approximation or the patent val. | ||
Added: [[User:Lucius Chiaraviglio|Lucius Chiaraviglio]] ([[User talk:Lucius Chiaraviglio|talk]]) 15:14, 2 May 2025 (UTC)<br> | Added: [[User:Lucius Chiaraviglio|Lucius Chiaraviglio]] ([[User talk:Lucius Chiaraviglio|talk]]) 15:14, 2 May 2025 (UTC)<br> | ||
Last modified: [[User:Lucius Chiaraviglio|Lucius Chiaraviglio]] ([[User talk:Lucius Chiaraviglio|talk]]) | Last modified: [[User:Lucius Chiaraviglio|Lucius Chiaraviglio]] ([[User talk:Lucius Chiaraviglio|talk]]) 18:57, 2 May 2025 (UTC) | ||