Talk:The Riemann zeta function and tuning: Difference between revisions
m →Alternate list based on unmodified zeta function: missing bracket |
|||
| Line 135: | Line 135: | ||
Take a look at [[User:Godtone/zeta#Top 10]] and compare edos you're unsure about to [[User:Godtone/optimal_edo_sequences]] by looking for number of occurrences | Take a look at [[User:Godtone/zeta#Top 10]] and compare edos you're unsure about to [[User:Godtone/optimal_edo_sequences]] by looking for number of occurrences | ||
(please share any findings/concerns here or on {{nowrap| [[User talk:Godtone/zeta|the talk page for the zeta page I made]]. }} | (please share any findings/concerns here or on {{nowrap| [[User talk:Godtone/zeta|the talk page for the zeta page I made]]). }} | ||
A rather strange recurring theme is 60edo is liked by zeta a surprising amount, but looking at its low- and high-limit tuning profile it doesn't seem that remarkable to me. (A strange coincidence is some time ago I had a dream that this was a good edo. That doesn't happen often at all (dreaming about edos, let alone a specific one being good; the dream said its 11-limit was good; maybe that's true in the sense that the high errors of 5, 7 and 11 can easily cancel each-other out in ratios or composites, since zeta doesn't obey a val). Also happens to be significant as the simplest way to represent fourth-order ambiguities in my theory of functional harmony which I derived from first principles starting from [[Ringer scale]]s (especially Perfect Ringer scales), so that (other than the 12edo intervals) it represents the most xenmelodically nontrivial categories available (which correspond to areas of nontrivial harmony).) | A rather strange recurring theme is 60edo is liked by zeta a surprising amount, but looking at its low- and high-limit tuning profile it doesn't seem that remarkable to me. (A strange coincidence is some time ago I had a dream that this was a good edo. That doesn't happen often at all (dreaming about edos, let alone a specific one being good; the dream said its 11-limit was good; maybe that's true in the sense that the high errors of 5, 7 and 11 can easily cancel each-other out in ratios or composites, since zeta doesn't obey a val). Also happens to be significant as the simplest way to represent fourth-order ambiguities in my theory of functional harmony which I derived from first principles starting from [[Ringer scale]]s (especially Perfect Ringer scales), so that (other than the 12edo intervals) it represents the most xenmelodically nontrivial categories available (which correspond to areas of nontrivial harmony).) | ||