Talk:Tempered monzos and vals: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
– [[User:Sintel|Sintel🎏]] ([[User_talk:Sintel|talk]]) 23:34, 22 April 2025 (UTC) | – [[User:Sintel|Sintel🎏]] ([[User_talk:Sintel|talk]]) 23:34, 22 April 2025 (UTC) | ||
Agree. Battaglia and co have a habit of making a page titled one thing and then making that page about something completely different. (See the history of the radical interval page for another example. ---[[User:VectorGraphics|VectorGraphics]] ([[User talk:VectorGraphics|talk]]) 23:57, 22 April 2025 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 23:57, 22 April 2025
|
This page also contains archived Wikispaces discussion. |
Unnecessary formalization
The formal definitions given here:
- Mathematically, a regular temperament is a homomorphism (a kind of function) from the space of just intervals to the space of tempered intervals generated by that temperament, where both these spaces are abelian groups. Technically, a regular temperament is an equivalence class of functions separated by unimodular transformations, which represent the same temperament.
are completely out of place, and furthermore they are inconsistent with definitions given elsewhere (such as on Mathematical theory of regular temperaments, which I would consider "canonical" despite the many problems of that page). I would just remove them entirely since they don't add anything.
– Sintel🎏 (talk) 23:34, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
Agree. Battaglia and co have a habit of making a page titled one thing and then making that page about something completely different. (See the history of the radical interval page for another example. ---VectorGraphics (talk) 23:57, 22 April 2025 (UTC)