User talk:Aura: Difference between revisions

Line 422:

::::::::: For 17L 2s, had to go for a 2.3.5.23.53 meantone extension to get the soft half of the spectrum — the 13th harmonic mapping just wasn't stable enough. Now that I've got that done, I wonder if giving the very high harmonics another look might turn up something similar for 11L 2s? Bonus points if it works accurately enough to include an EDO as large as 159edo (for the 17L 2 meantone extension, 146edo was too big to fit without an accuracy-degrading 'c' wart as well as an 'i' wart). [[User:Lucius Chiaraviglio|Lucius Chiaraviglio]] ([[User talk:Lucius Chiaraviglio|talk]]) 10:13, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

::::::::: On second thought, what turned out to be necessary for (at least the soft half of) 17L 2s might not help for 11L 2s, because the former didn't have a stable generator fraction within range, whereas the latter does &mbdash; hence the same extraordinary measures might not do much for it. But it can't hurt to check. [[User:Lucius Chiaraviglio|Lucius Chiaraviglio]] ([[User talk:Lucius Chiaraviglio|talk]]) 11:28, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

Revision as of 10:13, 22 April 2025 view source Lucius Chiaraviglio (talk \| contribs) 2,622 edits →Temperament(s) for Diatonicized Chromaticism?: 17L 2s: 2.3.5.23.53 meantone extension for the win! ← Older edit		Revision as of 11:28, 22 April 2025 view source Lucius Chiaraviglio (talk \| contribs) 2,622 edits →Temperament(s) for Diatonicized Chromaticism?: Second thoughts about 11L 2s high limit Newer edit →
Line 422:		Line 422:

	::::::::: For 17L 2s, had to go for a 2.3.5.23.53 meantone extension to get the soft half of the spectrum — the 13th harmonic mapping just wasn't stable enough. Now that I've got that done, I wonder if giving the very high harmonics another look might turn up something similar for 11L 2s? Bonus points if it works accurately enough to include an EDO as large as 159edo (for the 17L 2 meantone extension, 146edo was too big to fit without an accuracy-degrading 'c' wart as well as an 'i' wart). [[User:Lucius Chiaraviglio\|Lucius Chiaraviglio]] ([[User talk:Lucius Chiaraviglio\|talk]]) 10:13, 22 April 2025 (UTC)		::::::::: For 17L 2s, had to go for a 2.3.5.23.53 meantone extension to get the soft half of the spectrum — the 13th harmonic mapping just wasn't stable enough. Now that I've got that done, I wonder if giving the very high harmonics another look might turn up something similar for 11L 2s? Bonus points if it works accurately enough to include an EDO as large as 159edo (for the 17L 2 meantone extension, 146edo was too big to fit without an accuracy-degrading 'c' wart as well as an 'i' wart). [[User:Lucius Chiaraviglio\|Lucius Chiaraviglio]] ([[User talk:Lucius Chiaraviglio\|talk]]) 10:13, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
			::::::::: On second thought, what turned out to be necessary for (at least the soft half of) 17L 2s might not help for 11L 2s, because the former didn't have a stable generator fraction within range, whereas the latter does &mbdash; hence the same extraordinary measures might not do much for it. But it can't hurt to check. [[User:Lucius Chiaraviglio\|Lucius Chiaraviglio]] ([[User talk:Lucius Chiaraviglio\|talk]]) 11:28, 22 April 2025 (UTC)