Octave numbering and exponent review
BudjarnLambeth (talk | contribs)
 
Line 29: Line 29:
The octave number 8 is fine, but the exponent in ''(2<sup>8</sup>, hence 8<sup>th</sup> octave)'' should be (8-1) = 7 instead of 8 – do you agree? <br>(The Infobox AFDO calculates correctly.)<br>
The octave number 8 is fine, but the exponent in ''(2<sup>8</sup>, hence 8<sup>th</sup> octave)'' should be (8-1) = 7 instead of 8 – do you agree? <br>(The Infobox AFDO calculates correctly.)<br>
All the best - Holger ([[User:Holger Stoltenberg|Holger Stoltenberg]] ([[User talk:Holger Stoltenberg|talk]]) 16:50, 15 January 2025 (UTC))
All the best - Holger ([[User:Holger Stoltenberg|Holger Stoltenberg]] ([[User talk:Holger Stoltenberg|talk]]) 16:50, 15 January 2025 (UTC))
:: I agree. That part of the text was actually not added by me, it was added on 08:41, 10 February 2020 by the page’s original author. Nonetheless I will correct it now. Thank you for pointing it out :) Kind regards, --[[User:BudjarnLambeth|BudjarnLambeth]] ([[User talk:BudjarnLambeth|talk]]) 01:59, 16 January 2025 (UTC)