BudjarnLambeth
Joined 22 July 2022
Octave numbering and exponent review |
|||
| Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
The octave number 8 is fine, but the exponent in ''(2<sup>8</sup>, hence 8<sup>th</sup> octave)'' should be (8-1) = 7 instead of 8 – do you agree? <br>(The Infobox AFDO calculates correctly.)<br> | The octave number 8 is fine, but the exponent in ''(2<sup>8</sup>, hence 8<sup>th</sup> octave)'' should be (8-1) = 7 instead of 8 – do you agree? <br>(The Infobox AFDO calculates correctly.)<br> | ||
All the best - Holger ([[User:Holger Stoltenberg|Holger Stoltenberg]] ([[User talk:Holger Stoltenberg|talk]]) 16:50, 15 January 2025 (UTC)) | All the best - Holger ([[User:Holger Stoltenberg|Holger Stoltenberg]] ([[User talk:Holger Stoltenberg|talk]]) 16:50, 15 January 2025 (UTC)) | ||
:: I agree. That part of the text was actually not added by me, it was added on 08:41, 10 February 2020 by the page’s original author. Nonetheless I will correct it now. Thank you for pointing it out :) Kind regards, --[[User:BudjarnLambeth|BudjarnLambeth]] ([[User talk:BudjarnLambeth|talk]]) 01:59, 16 January 2025 (UTC) | |||