Sagittal notation: Difference between revisions
ArrowHead294 (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
ArrowHead294 (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
The '''Evo''' flavor (short for "evolutionary", previously called "mixed") uses only single-shaft Sagittal symbols, e.g. {{sagittal| /| }} {{sagittal| \! }} {{sagittal| |) }} {{sagittal| !) }}, alone or in combination with conventional sharps and flats and their doubles. Only the large variant of the double sharp {{sagittal| x }} (U+E47D) is considered to be stylistically-compatible with Sagittal symbols. Evo is much easier to learn, but it results in a greater number of symbols on the sheet, which can give it a more cluttered appearance, particularly with chords, and it may be confusing when two symbols alter the same note in opposite directions. | The '''Evo''' flavor (short for "evolutionary", previously called "mixed") uses only single-shaft Sagittal symbols, e.g. {{sagittal| /| }} {{sagittal| \! }} {{sagittal| |) }} {{sagittal| !) }}, alone or in combination with conventional sharps and flats and their doubles. Only the large variant of the double sharp {{sagittal| x }} (U+E47D) is considered to be stylistically-compatible with Sagittal symbols. Evo is much easier to learn, but it results in a greater number of symbols on the sheet, which can give it a more cluttered appearance, particularly with chords, and it may be confusing when two symbols alter the same note in opposite directions. | ||
<span id="Evo-SZ"></span> A sub-flavor of Evo is '''Evo-SZ''' (Evo with | <span id="Evo-SZ"></span> A sub-flavor of Evo is '''Evo-SZ''' (Evo with Stein–Zimmermann). This is where any sagittals that are notating exactly half the alteration of a sharp or flat (most often {{sagittal| /|\ }} {{sagittal| \!/ }}) are replaced by the Stein–Zimmermann semisharp {{sagittal| > }} and narrow reversed flat {{sagittal| < }}, and the corresponding combinations (most often {{sagittal| /|\ }}{{sagittal| # }} and {{sagittal| \!/ }}{{sagittal| b }}) are replaced by {{sagittal| ># }} and {{sagittal| <b }}. The narrow variants of the fractional flats {{sagittal| < }} (U+E284) and {{sagittal| <b }} (U+E285) are preferred because they preserve the Sagittal principle that the visual size of a symbol should indicate the relative size of its alteration and they reduce left-right confusion. | ||
=== Revo === | === Revo === | ||
Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
== Notation software support == | == Notation software support == | ||
=== Sibelius === | === Sibelius === | ||
Sagibelius 2.0 | Sagibelius 2.0 – plugins for using Sagittal notation in Sibelius 4 and up. By [http://www.jacobbarton.net/2011/10/sagibelius-2-0-released/ Jacob Barton]. Hosted on this wiki. Donationware. | ||
[[:File:Sagibelius_2.0.zip|Sagibelius_2.0.zip]] | [[:File:Sagibelius_2.0.zip|Sagibelius_2.0.zip]] | ||
Line 52: | Line 52: | ||
** [[Prayer of Thanks]] | ** [[Prayer of Thanks]] | ||
* [[:File:sunday3.pdf|Sunday Pipes]] in [[22edo | * [[:File:sunday3.pdf|Sunday Pipes]] in [[22edo]] by [[Mats Öljare]] | ||
* Tibia in [[22edo | * Tibia in [[22edo]] by [[Paul Erlich]] ([http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d44Lfp9lAG8 Listen]). Sagittal score [[:File:TIBIA.pdf|in F||\]] or [[:File:tibia_in_g.pdf|in G]] (contains errors in measures 9, 19 and 20) | ||
* [[:File:Ivor_Darreg,_Suite.pdf|On the Enharmonic Tetrachord (from Suite, Op. 62)]], in [[22edo | * [[:File:Ivor_Darreg,_Suite.pdf|On the Enharmonic Tetrachord (from Suite, Op. 62)]], in [[22edo]], by [[Ivor Darreg]]. Originally printed in the Spring 1975 issue of Xenharmonikon in quarter-tone notation. Transcribed to Sagittal by [[Juhani Nuorvala]].([https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DvHvza1vtfo Listen]) | ||
== Gallery == | == Gallery == |