Interleaving: Difference between revisions

Inthar (talk | contribs)
Inthar (talk | contribs)
Line 32: Line 32:


== Ternary interleaved scales ==
== Ternary interleaved scales ==
Conjecture: Given a [[ternary]] [[step signature]] of the form {{nowrap|''a'''''X'''''b'''''Y'''(''a'' + ''b'')'''Z'''}} where gcd(''a'', ''b'') = 1, there exists a unique single-period (abstractly) 2-interleaved ternary [[word|scale word]] with that step signature. This ternary scale word consists of ''a''-many '''XZ''' subwords and ''b''-many '''YZ''' subwords arranged in a MOS pattern (like the steps of ''a'''''L'''''b'''''s''') and consists of an interleaved pair of two {{nowrap|''a''('''X''' + '''Z''')''b''('''Y''' + '''Z''')}} subsets, offset by '''Z'''. [[Blackdye]] ('''sLmLsLmLsL''', 5'''L'''2'''m'''3'''s''') and [[whitedye]] ('''LsLsLsmsLsLsms''', 5'''L'''2'''m'''7'''s''') are examples of this.
Given a [[ternary]] [[step signature]] of the form {{nowrap|''a'''''X'''''b'''''Y'''(''a'' + ''b'')'''Z'''}} where gcd(''a'', ''b'') = 1, there exists a unique single-period (abstractly) 2-interleaved ternary [[word|scale word]] with that step signature. This ternary scale word consists of ''a''-many '''XZ''' subwords and ''b''-many '''YZ''' subwords arranged in a MOS pattern (like the steps of ''a'''''L'''''b'''''s''') and consists of an interleaved pair of two {{nowrap|''a''('''X''' + '''Z''')''b''('''Y''' + '''Z''')}} subsets, offset by '''Z'''. [[Blackdye]] ('''sLmLsLmLsL''', 5'''L'''2'''m'''3'''s''') and [[whitedye]] ('''LsLsLsmsLsLsms''', 5'''L'''2'''m'''7'''s''') are examples of this.


Proof: Suppose the scale is made of two interleaved subsets offset by the abstract interval '''δ'''.  
=== Lemma ===
If ''S'' consists of the subwords '''XZ''' and '''YZ''' arranged in the pattern of a single-period binary circular word ''w'', and ''k'' is an odd number greater than 1 and less than |''S''|, then the class of ''k''-steps has more than 3 abstract intervals.
 
Proof: Let ''A'' be the set of all (''k'' - 1)/2-step intervals of ''w''. |''A''| = 1 implies that ''k'' = 1 mod |''w''|, so |''A''| &ge; 2 and contains at least two intervals '''w'''<sub>1</sub> and '''w'''<sub>2</sub>.
 
Say |''A''| = 2. (If |''A''| &ge; 3 then the proof is easy.) Suppose the (''k'' - 1)-step subword σ of ''S'' has size '''w'''<sub>1</sub>, and assume WOLOG that σ ends in '''Z'''. Then '''Z'''σ and σ'''W''' are subwords, where '''W''' is a non-'''Z''' letter. Assume WOLOG '''W''' = '''X'''. Then we have that the word σ'''X''' = '''V'''τ for some non-'''Z''' letter '''V''' and subword τ.
 
=== Proof of Theorem ===
Proof of Conjecture: Suppose the scale is made of two interleaved subsets offset by the abstract interval '''δ'''.  


Case 1: gcd(2(''a'' + ''b''), ''k'') = 1. If ''k'' = 1, then any '''Z'''<sup>''q''</sup> a maximal subword of consecutive '''Z'''s has ''q'' odd, and they all must be the same length and separated by one non-'''Z''' letter '''W''':
Case 1: gcd(2(''a'' + ''b''), ''k'') = 1. If ''k'' = 1, then any '''Z'''<sup>''q''</sup> a maximal subword of consecutive '''Z'''s has ''q'' odd, and they all must be the same length and separated by one non-'''Z''' letter '''W''':