42edo: Difference between revisions

BudjarnLambeth (talk | contribs)
BudjarnLambeth (talk | contribs)
Octave stretch: Additions requested by a composer in the Monthly Tuning Facebook Group when I shared this table
Line 20: Line 20:
42edo’s inaccurate 3rd and 5th harmonics can be greatly improved through [[octave stretching]] or [[octave shrinking]]. Both approaches work about equally well but in opposite directions, giving two quite different flavors of tuning to play with.  
42edo’s inaccurate 3rd and 5th harmonics can be greatly improved through [[octave stretching]] or [[octave shrinking]]. Both approaches work about equally well but in opposite directions, giving two quite different flavors of tuning to play with.  


The following is a table comparing stretched and shrunk tunings of 42edo:
Click “expand” for a table comparing the properties of three stretched and two compressed tunings of 42edo:


{| class="wikitable mw-collapsible"
{| class="wikitable mw-collapsible mw-collapsed"
|+
|+
!Tuning
!Tuning
![[42ed257/128]] <br>(~41.77edo)
! [[42ed257/128]]
![[1ed28.7c|APS720jot]] <br>(~41.81edo)
! [[1ed28.7c|APS720jot]]
![[zpi|189zpi]] <br>(~41.83edo)
! [[zpi|189zpi]]
![[42edo]]
! [[42edo]]
![[191zpi]] <br>(~42.19edo)
! [[191zpi]]
![[ed255/128#42ed255/128|42ed255/128]] <br>(~42.24edo)
! [[ed255/128#42ed255/128|42ed255/128]]
|-
|-
|Overview
! Steps / octave
|great: 5 <br>good: 2, 3, 7 <br>okay: <br>bad: 11, 13
| ~41.77
|great: 5 <br>good: 2, 3 <br>okay: 7, 11, 13 <br>bad:
| ~41.81
|great: 5 <br>good: 2, 13 <br>okay: 3, 11 <br>bad: 7
| ~41.83
|great: 2, 7 <br>good: <br>okay: 11 <br>bad: 3, 5, 13
| 42.00
|great: 5, 11, 13 <br>good: 2, 3 <br>okay: <br>bad: 7
| ~42.19
|great: 3, 5, 11 <br>good: 2 <br>okay: 13 <br>bad: 7
| ~42.24
|-
|-
|2/1 relative error
! Step size
|23.5%
| ~28.73¢
|19.0%
| ~28.70¢
|17.2%
| ~28.69¢
|0.0%
| ~28.57¢
|18.8%
| ~28.44¢
|23.9%
| ~28.41¢
|-
|-
|3/1 rel. err.
! Overview
|19.6%
| great: 5 <br>good: 2, 3, 7 <br>okay: <br>bad: 11, 13
|26.7%
| great: 5 <br>good: 2, 3 <br>okay: 7, 11, 13 <br>bad:
|29.6%
| great: 5 <br>good: 2, 13 <br>okay: 3, 11 <br>bad: 7
|43.2%
| great: 2, 7 <br>good: <br>okay: 11 <br>bad: 3, 5, 13
|13.4%
| great: 5, 11, 13 <br>good: 2, 3 <br>okay: <br>bad: 7
|5.4%
| great: 3, 5, 11 <br>good: 2 <br>okay: 13 <br>bad: 7
|-
|-
|5/1 rel. err.
! 2/1 relative error
|2.4%
| +23.5% (6.7¢)
|7.9%
| +19.0% (5.5¢)
|12.2%
| +17.2% (4.9¢)
|47.9%
| 0.0% (0.0¢)
|4.3%
| −18.8% (5.3¢)
|7.5%
| −23.9% (6.8¢)
|-
|-
| 7/1 rel. err.
! 3/1 rel. err.
|24.9%
| −19.6% (5.6¢)
|37.5%
| −26.7% (7.7¢)
|42.6%
| −29.6% (8.5¢)
|9.1%
| +43.2% (12.3¢)
|43.6%
| +13.4% (3.8¢)
|42.2%
| +5.4% (1.5¢)
|-
|-
|11/1 rel. err.
! 5/1 rel. err.
|48.3%
| +2.4% (0.7¢)
|36.2%
| −7.9% (2.3¢)
|29.8%
| −12.2% (3.5¢)
|29.6%
| +47.9% (13.7¢)
|5.5%
| +4.3% (1.2¢)
|12.1%
| −7.5% (2.1¢)
|-
|-
| 13/1 rel. err.
! 7/1 rel. err.
|45.1%
| −24.9% (7.2¢)
|28.6%
| −37.5% (10.8¢)
|21.7%
| −42.6% (12.2¢)
|41.8%
| +9.1% (2.6¢)
|11.3%
| −43.6% (12.4¢)
|30.1%
| +42.2% (12.0¢)
|-
! 11/1 rel. err.
| −48.3% (13.9¢)
| +36.2% (10.4¢)
| +29.8% (8.6¢)
| −29.6% (8.5¢)
| +5.5% (1.6¢)
| −12.1% (3.4¢)
|-
! 13/1 rel. err.
| +45.1% (13.0¢)
| +28.6% (8.2¢)
| +21.7% (6.2¢)
| −41.8% (12.0¢)
| −11.3% (3.2¢)
| −30.1% (8.6¢)
|}
|}