9th-octave temperaments: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 01:19, 7 October 2024 view source Lériendil (talk \| contribs) 8,044 edits mNo edit summary ← Older edit		Revision as of 07:16, 5 December 2024 view source BudjarnLambeth (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled, emailconfirmed 21,264 edits m navbox Newer edit →
Line 20:		Line 20:

	Some higher-limit interpretations of interest for both routes are [[14/13]]~[[13/12]] (tempering [[169/168\|S13]]) for lower-complexity interpretations of 1\9 [[34/27]] for 1\3 (tempering [[19683/19652]] to give an interpretation to [[3edo]]) and the "rooted/harmonic wolf fifth" [[47/32]] for 5\9, by tempering ([[64/47]])/[[49/36\|(7/6)<sup>2</sup>]] = [[2304/2303\|S48]] = ([[48/47]])/([[49/48]]).		Some higher-limit interpretations of interest for both routes are [[14/13]]~[[13/12]] (tempering [[169/168\|S13]]) for lower-complexity interpretations of 1\9 [[34/27]] for 1\3 (tempering [[19683/19652]] to give an interpretation to [[3edo]]) and the "rooted/harmonic wolf fifth" [[47/32]] for 5\9, by tempering ([[64/47]])/[[49/36\|(7/6)<sup>2</sup>]] = [[2304/2303\|S48]] = ([[48/47]])/([[49/48]]).

			{{Navbox fractional-octave}}