Maximal evenness: Difference between revisions

Inthar (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Inthar (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Distinguish|Distributional evenness}}
{{Distinguish|Distributional evenness}}
{{Wikipedia}}
{{Wikipedia}}
A [[periodic scale|periodic]] [[binary scale]] is '''maximally even''' ('''ME''')  with respect to an [[equal-step tuning]] if it is the result of rounding a smaller [[equal tuning]] to the nearest notes of the parent equal tuning with the same equave. Equivalently, a scale is maximally even if its two [[step]] sizes are [[Distributional evenness|evenly distributed]] within its [[step pattern]] and differ by exactly one step of the parent tuning. In other words, such a scale satisfies the property of '''maximal evenness'''. The first condition implies that ME scales are [[MOS scale]]s, and the second condition implies that the scale's [[step ratio]] is [[superparticular]].
A [[periodic scale|periodic]] [[binary scale]] is '''maximally even''' ('''ME''')  with respect to an [[equal-step tuning]] if it is the result of rounding a smaller equal tuning to the nearest notes of the parent equal tuning with the same equave. Equivalently, a scale is maximally even if its two [[step]] sizes are [[Distributional evenness|evenly distributed]] within its [[step pattern]] and differ by exactly one step of the parent tuning. In other words, such a scale satisfies the property of '''maximal evenness'''. The first condition implies that ME scales are [[MOS scale]]s, and the second condition implies that the scale's [[step ratio]] is [[superparticular]].


In particular, within every [[edo]], one can specify such a scale for every smaller number of notes. An ''m''-note maximally even scale in ''n''-edo is the closest ''n''-edo can get to representing ''m''-edo.
In particular, within every [[edo]], one can specify such a scale for every smaller number of notes. An ''m''-note maximally even scale in ''n''-edo is the closest ''n''-edo can get to representing ''m''-edo.