80edo: Difference between revisions
→Consistent circles: include unreduced EDOsteps |
→Theory: discuss optimality for echidna/fiventeen, note consistency of no-21's no-27's no-31's 41-odd-limit, and section |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
== Theory == | == Theory == | ||
80edo is the first edo that represents the [[19-odd-limit]] [[tonality diamond]] [[consistent]]ly, though it barely manages to do so. Despite this, a large number of intervals in higher odd limits in the [[29-limit|29-prime-limit]] are consistent, and its [[patent val]] generally does well at approximating (29-prime-limited) [[harmonic series]] segments, such as modes 16 through 30 but especially modes 8 through 15. It achieves this much consistency because all primes in the 29-limit except 13 are sharp of just, with inconsistencies usually arising through not cancelling the over-sharpness of compound harmonics | 80edo is the first edo that represents the [[19-odd-limit]] [[tonality diamond]] [[consistent]]ly, though it barely manages to do so. Despite this, a large number of intervals in higher odd limits in the [[29-limit|29-prime-limit]] are consistent, and its [[patent val]] generally does well at approximating (29-prime-limited) [[harmonic series]] segments, such as modes 16 through 30 but especially modes 8 through 15. It achieves this much consistency because all primes in the 29-limit except 13 are sharp of just, with inconsistencies usually arising through not cancelling the over-sharpness of compound harmonics 21, 27, 35, 45 and 49 (and their octave-equivalents), which may be seen as an interesting limitation. This means it can be used as a general-purpose approximate 29-prime-limit system with a relatively manageable number of tones, with some care taken around inconsistency. It can also model larger primes if one is willing to accept their sharpness and for this purpose it does well for its size at the no-31's [[41-limit]], or even the [[43-limit]] if you are fine with [[43/32]] being slightly flat causing more inconsistencies. In fact, except for [[26/25]], it is consistent in the no-21's no-27's no-31's no-35's [[41-odd-limit]]! If one wants higher precision as one goes to higher primes to try to convey the subtle harmonic qualities of those primes, 80et arguably fails in general, although many specific cases may be convincing. A promising alternative is using 80et as a model in which to fit higher-limit JI by way of approximating as much of the harmonic series as possible, for which it can model the 125-odd-limit quite well (corresponding to the 113-prime-limit), leading to an excellent [[Ringer scale]] described in the [[#Ringer 80|Ringer 80 section of this article]]. | ||
=== Significance of echidna === | |||
As an equal temperament, it is well-tuned for the important 11-limit and 17-limit half-octave-period temperament [[echidna]] (the 22&58 temperament), which affords great freedom in a 36-note MOS and still many choices in a 22-note MOS, offering a high-accuracy rank 2 detemper of [[22edo]], which in comparison conflates many important distinctions of the 11-limit. This is not insignificant as many abundant intervals of echidna, such as (especially) [[11/10]], [[9/7]] and [[17/16]], are tuned so accurately that they [[#Consistent circles|form 80-note consistent circles]]. Echidna supports [[srutal archagall]], which is also tuned near-optimally for [[fiventeen]] - specifically, for the characteristic fiventeen pentad, 30:34:40:45:51:60, consisting of steps of [[20/17]] and [[9/8]]~[[17/15]], and is the smallest edo to improve on the tuning of srutal archagall + fiventeen after [[34edo]]. In its representation of echidna, the least accurate tuning is that of [[7/4]], which is (relatively) very sharp in 80edo, for which [[58edo]] does better as a tuning of echidna (though much worse as a tuning for srutal archagall/diaschismic and especially fiventeen); one can reason this makes the 80edo tuning of echidna feel more like a detemper of 22edo (especially given the smaller step size between adjacent notes equated in 22edo). | |||
=== Commas === | |||
80et [[Tempering out|tempers out]] [[2048/2025]] in the 5-limit; [[1728/1715]], [[3136/3125]], [[4000/3969]], and [[4375/4374]] in the [[7-limit]]; [[176/175]], [[540/539]] and [[4000/3993]] in the [[11-limit]]; [[169/168]], [[325/324]], [[351/350]], [[352/351]], [[364/363]] and [[1001/1000]] in the [[13-limit]]; [[136/135]], [[221/220]], [[256/255]], [[289/288]], [[561/560]], [[595/594]], [[715/714]], [[936/935]] and [[1275/1274]] in the [[17-limit]]; [[190/189]], [[286/285]], [[361/360]], [[400/399]], [[456/455]], [[476/475]], [[969/968]], [[1331/1330]], [[1445/1444]], [[1521/1520]], [[1540/1539]] and [[1729/1728]] in the [[19-limit]]; [[208/207]], [[253/252]], [[323/322]] and [[460/459]] in the [[23-limit]]; and 320/319 in the [[29-limit]]. The last comma is notable as it equates a sharp [[29/16]] with a near-perfect [[20/11]], although this equivalence begins to make more sense when you consider the error cancellations with other sharp harmonics and as a way to give more reasonable interpretations to otherwise questionably mapped intervals. It provides the [[optimal patent val]] for 5-limit [[diaschismic]], for 13-limit [[srutal]], and for 7-, 11- and 13-limit [[bidia]]. It is a good tuning for various temperaments in [[canou family]], especially in higher limits. | 80et [[Tempering out|tempers out]] [[2048/2025]] in the 5-limit; [[1728/1715]], [[3136/3125]], [[4000/3969]], and [[4375/4374]] in the [[7-limit]]; [[176/175]], [[540/539]] and [[4000/3993]] in the [[11-limit]]; [[169/168]], [[325/324]], [[351/350]], [[352/351]], [[364/363]] and [[1001/1000]] in the [[13-limit]]; [[136/135]], [[221/220]], [[256/255]], [[289/288]], [[561/560]], [[595/594]], [[715/714]], [[936/935]] and [[1275/1274]] in the [[17-limit]]; [[190/189]], [[286/285]], [[361/360]], [[400/399]], [[456/455]], [[476/475]], [[969/968]], [[1331/1330]], [[1445/1444]], [[1521/1520]], [[1540/1539]] and [[1729/1728]] in the [[19-limit]]; [[208/207]], [[253/252]], [[323/322]] and [[460/459]] in the [[23-limit]]; and 320/319 in the [[29-limit]]. The last comma is notable as it equates a sharp [[29/16]] with a near-perfect [[20/11]], although this equivalence begins to make more sense when you consider the error cancellations with other sharp harmonics and as a way to give more reasonable interpretations to otherwise questionably mapped intervals. It provides the [[optimal patent val]] for 5-limit [[diaschismic]], for 13-limit [[srutal]], and for 7-, 11- and 13-limit [[bidia]]. It is a good tuning for various temperaments in [[canou family]], especially in higher limits. | ||