Xenharmonic Wiki:Cross-platform dialogue: Difference between revisions

Line 252:

== Ranking poll for "good" EDOs from 27 to 140 ==

I thought it might be cool to do a poll to see which of these EDOs people subjectively prefer over others. It's far from all EDOs in the 27 to 140 range; I've picked the ones that seem the most significant theoretically as being worth interest, but if you think something's missing there is an option "[your favourite RTT EDO between 27 and 140 not on this list]" at the bottom of the list. The list is in order of number of notes per octave and I hope that each participant takes the time to sort all EDOs they have opinions on to the top and the bottom; if you're not sure that's why I've provided subgroups in up to the 89-prime-limit, although if you just focus on the 43-prime-limit part that's more reliable and probably a lot more intuitive for appraisal purposes.

I thought it might be cool to do a poll to see which of these EDOs people subjectively prefer over others. It's far from all EDOs in the 27 to 140 range; I've picked the ones that seem the most significant theoretically as being worth interest, but if you think something's missing there is an option "[your favourite RTT EDO between 27 and 140 not on this list]" at the bottom of the list. The list is in order of number of notes per octave and I hope that each participant takes the time to sort all EDOs they have opinions on to the top and the bottom; if you're not sure that's why I've provided subgroups in up to the 97-prime-limit, although if you just focus on the 43-prime-limit part that's more reliable and probably a lot more intuitive for appraisal purposes.

If you're wondering "why such a high prime limit"? here's details/explainers of the significance of all primes >43 that I've included:

@@ Line 252: / Line 252: @@
 == Ranking poll for "good" EDOs from 27 to 140 ==
-I thought it might be cool to do a poll to see which of these EDOs people subjectively prefer over others. It's far from all EDOs in the 27 to 140 range; I've picked the ones that seem the most significant theoretically as being worth interest, but if you think something's missing there is an option "[your favourite RTT EDO between 27 and 140 not on this list]" at the bottom of the list. The list is in order of number of notes per octave and I hope that each participant takes the time to sort all EDOs they have opinions on to the top and the bottom; if you're not sure that's why I've provided subgroups in up to the 89-prime-limit, although if you just focus on the 43-prime-limit part that's more reliable and probably a lot more intuitive for appraisal purposes.
+I thought it might be cool to do a poll to see which of these EDOs people subjectively prefer over others. It's far from all EDOs in the 27 to 140 range; I've picked the ones that seem the most significant theoretically as being worth interest, but if you think something's missing there is an option "[your favourite RTT EDO between 27 and 140 not on this list]" at the bottom of the list. The list is in order of number of notes per octave and I hope that each participant takes the time to sort all EDOs they have opinions on to the top and the bottom; if you're not sure that's why I've provided subgroups in up to the 97-prime-limit, although if you just focus on the 43-prime-limit part that's more reliable and probably a lot more intuitive for appraisal purposes.
 If you're wondering "why such a high prime limit"? here's details/explainers of the significance of all primes >43 that I've included: