Xenharmonic Wiki:Cross-platform dialogue: Difference between revisions
→Mike's Response to All This: formatting |
→Mike's Response to All This: signature |
||
| Line 135: | Line 135: | ||
The actual math is neither here nor there, but FWIW, I'm the one who put together KE, WE, TWE, all of that to begin with, so I'm fairly familiar with it. Yes, I get that CTE has this claim on-paper that it's the closest point to the JIP with pure octaves and the TE norm. It also weights 16/13 higher than 6/5, because 16/13 happens to be octave-equivalent to 13/1. This has all been talked about in the past many times - if this is what you want, great, but it isn't the one-size-fits-all solution, and we generally prefer tunings like POTE, KE, etc. | The actual math is neither here nor there, but FWIW, I'm the one who put together KE, WE, TWE, all of that to begin with, so I'm fairly familiar with it. Yes, I get that CTE has this claim on-paper that it's the closest point to the JIP with pure octaves and the TE norm. It also weights 16/13 higher than 6/5, because 16/13 happens to be octave-equivalent to 13/1. This has all been talked about in the past many times - if this is what you want, great, but it isn't the one-size-fits-all solution, and we generally prefer tunings like POTE, KE, etc. | ||
Thanks. | Thanks. [[User:Mike Battaglia|Mike Battaglia]] ([[User talk:Mike Battaglia|talk]]) 08:19, 16 March 2024 (UTC) | ||