Ternary scale theorems: Difference between revisions

Inthar (talk | contribs)
Inthar (talk | contribs)
Line 61: Line 61:


==== Statement (2) ====
==== Statement (2) ====
In case 2, let (2, 1) &minus; (1, 1) = g<sub>1</sub>, (1, 2) &minus; (2, 1) = g<sub>2</sub> be the two alternants. Let g<sub>3</sub> be the leftover generator after stacking alternating g<sub>1</sub> and g<sub>2</sub>. Then the generator circle is (g<sub>1</sub> g<sub>2</sub>)<sup>floor(''n''/2)</sup> g<sub>3</sub>. Assuming that a step is an odd number of generators, the combinations of alternants corresponding to a step come in exactly 3 sizes:
In case 2, let (2, 1) &minus; (1, 1) = g<sub>1</sub>, (1, 2) &minus; (2, 1) = g<sub>2</sub> be the two alternants. Let g<sub>3</sub> be the leftover generator after stacking alternating g<sub>1</sub> and g<sub>2</sub>. Then the generator circle is (g<sub>1</sub> g<sub>2</sub>)<sup>floor(''n''/2)</sup> g<sub>3</sub>. Assuming that a step is formed by stacking ''k'' generators, where ''k'' is odd, the combinations of alternants corresponding to a step come in exactly 3 sizes:
# ''k''g<sub>1</sub> + (''k'' &minus; 1)g<sub>2</sub>
# ''k''g<sub>1</sub> + (''k'' &minus; 1)g<sub>2</sub>
# (''k'' &minus; 1)g<sub>1</sub> + ''k''g<sub>2</sub>
# (''k'' &minus; 1)g<sub>1</sub> + ''k''g<sub>2</sub>
# (''k'' &minus; 1)g<sub>1</sub> + (''k'' &minus; 1) g<sub>2</sub> + g<sub>3</sub>
# (''k'' &minus; 1)g<sub>1</sub> + (''k'' &minus; 1) g<sub>2</sub> + g<sub>3</sub>
(since the scale size is odd, we can always ensure this by taking octave complements of all the generators). The first two sizes must occur the same number of times. This proves (2).
(since the scale size is odd, we can always ensure this by taking octave complements of all the generators). By counting the length-k subwords of the word (g<sub>1</sub> g<sub>2</sub>)<sup>floor(''n''/2)</sup>, we see that the first two sizes must occur the same number of times. This proves (2).


(The above holds for any odd ''n'' ≥ 3.)
(The above holds for any odd ''n'' ≥ 3.)