Talk:Slendroschisma: Difference between revisions

Line 1:

== Name ==

This name sounds confusing to me, like it's describing the comma of [[slendric]] when it is not. Similar to [[256/255]], I think clarifications like "not to be confused with slendric comma (1029/1024, 8.43¢) or slendro diesis (49/48, 35.7¢)" should not be not needed. It is even worse than with the 256/255 situation here, since the temperament of this comma has been already named, and because there are already are 2 [[slendro]]-related interval names to begin with (slendric comma and slendro diesis). This name is derived from "slendric schisma", so I would suggest something like slendrischisma, similar to the [[garischisma]], that would be different enough for it to be understood to not be a slendro comma.

This name sounds confusing to me, like it's describing the comma of [[slendric]] when it is not. Similar to [[256/255]], I think clarifications like "not to be confused with slendric comma (1029/1024, 8.43¢) or slendro diesis (49/48, 35.7¢)" should not be not needed. It is even worse than with the 256/255 situation here, since the temperament of this comma has been already named "slendrismic" now, and because there are already are 2 [[slendro]]-related interval names to begin with (slendric comma and slendro diesis). This name is derived from "slendric schisma", so I would suggest something like slendrischisma, similar to the [[garischisma]], that would be different enough for it to be understood to not be a slendro comma.

[[User:CompactStar|CompactStar]] ([[User talk:CompactStar|talk]]) 01:42, 2 January 2024 (UTC)

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 == Name ==
-This name sounds confusing to me, like it's describing the comma of [[slendric]] when it is not. Similar to [[256/255]], I think clarifications like "not to be confused with slendric comma (1029/1024, 8.43¢) or slendro diesis (49/48, 35.7¢)" should not be not needed. It is even worse than with the 256/255 situation here, since the temperament of this comma has been already named, and because there are already are 2 [[slendro]]-related interval names to begin with (slendric comma and slendro diesis). This name is derived from "slendric schisma", so I would suggest something like slendrischisma, similar to the [[garischisma]], that would be different enough for it to be understood to not be a slendro comma.
+This name sounds confusing to me, like it's describing the comma of [[slendric]] when it is not. Similar to [[256/255]], I think clarifications like "not to be confused with slendric comma (1029/1024, 8.43¢) or slendro diesis (49/48, 35.7¢)" should not be not needed. It is even worse than with the 256/255 situation here, since the temperament of this comma has been already named "slendrismic" now, and because there are already are 2 [[slendro]]-related interval names to begin with (slendric comma and slendro diesis). This name is derived from "slendric schisma", so I would suggest something like slendrischisma, similar to the [[garischisma]], that would be different enough for it to be understood to not be a slendro comma.
 [[User:CompactStar|CompactStar]] ([[User talk:CompactStar|talk]]) 01:42, 2 January 2024 (UTC)