Ternary scale theorems: Difference between revisions

Inthar (talk | contribs)
Inthar (talk | contribs)
Line 227: Line 227:


== Theorem 5 (Classification of MV3 scales) ==
== Theorem 5 (Classification of MV3 scales) ==
# A single-period MV3 is either (1) equivalent to XYZYX, (2) constructed from aX bZ with a even and gcd(a, b) = 1 by replacing every other X with Y, (3) constructed from 2aX 2bY with a odd and gcd(a, b) = 1 by replacing every other X with Y, or (4) a "twisted" word constructed as follows:
# A single-period MV3 is either (1) equivalent to XYZYX, (2) equivalent to XYXZXYX, (3) constructed from aX bZ with a even and gcd(a, b) = 1 by replacing every other X with Y, (4) constructed from 2aX 2bY with a odd and gcd(a, b) = 1 by replacing every other X with Y, or (5) a "twisted" word constructed as follows:
## Start with a power of a multimos word ''w''(X, Z) = ''ka''X ''kb''Z such that ''a'' is even and each ''a''X ''b''Z subword of ''w'' is of the form X''P''(X, Z)Z where ''P''(X, Z) is a palindrome.
## Start with a power of a multimos word ''w''(X, Z) = ''ka''X ''kb''Z such that ''a'' is even and each ''a''X ''b''Z subword of ''w'' is of the form X''P''(X, Z)Z where ''P''(X, Z) is a palindrome.
## Interchange some of the Z's and X's at some of the borders of these copies of the mos word ''w''.
## Interchange some of the Z's and X's at some of the borders of these copies of the mos word ''w''.
Line 234: Line 234:
# Single-period MV3 scales not of type (4) and not of the form XYZYX are ''balanced'': for any ''k'', any pair of k-steps has a difference that contains +1, -1, or 0 of each step size.
# Single-period MV3 scales not of type (4) and not of the form XYZYX are ''balanced'': for any ''k'', any pair of k-steps has a difference that contains +1, -1, or 0 of each step size.
=== Proof ===
=== Proof ===
Proven by Bulgakova, Buzhinsky and Goncharov (2023), "[https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304397522006417 On balanced and abelian properties of circular words over a ternary alphabet]" (and Theorem 4). Note that PWF scales are type (2) in this classification.
Proven by Bulgakova, Buzhinsky and Goncharov (2023), "[https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304397522006417 On balanced and abelian properties of circular words over a ternary alphabet]" (and Theorem 4). Note that odd GO scales are type (3) in this classification.


[[Category:Math]]
[[Category:Math]]
[[Category:Ternary scale]]
[[Category:Ternary scale]]
[[Category:Scale]]
[[Category:Scale]]