User:Eliora/Proposed concept names: Difference between revisions
Cmloegcmluin (talk | contribs) "optimal GPV sequence" → "optimal ET sequence", per Talk:Optimal_ET_sequence |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Langwidge == | |||
Name originates from Adam Neely's video "''Is C# The Same Note as B?''". The generator is a slightly flat fifth, 9 of which yield [[38/1]], meaning that when octave-reduced, this would require spelling root-3rd-P5 triad with 19:16 as C-D#-E and not as C-Eb-E, producing a peculiar violation of standard Western music theory. | |||
Subgroup: 2.17.19 | |||
Comma list: 2.17.19 {{monzo|-109 9 17}} | |||
Sval mapping: [{{val|1 14 -1}}, {{val|0 -17 9}}] | |||
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~6137/4096 = 699.712 | |||
Optimal ET sequence: {{EDOs|12, 271, 283, 295, 307, 319, 331, 343, 355, 367, 379 ,391, 403, 415, 722}}, ... | |||
== Phosphorus == | == Phosphorus == | ||