Fractional-octave temperaments: Difference between revisions

@@ Line 112: / Line 112: @@
 Optimal tuning (CTE): ~3/2 = 701.9429
-Optiml GPV sequence: {{val list| 176, 660, 836, 1848, 2684, 4532, 15444, 19976e }}
+Optiml GPV sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 176, 660, 836, 1848, 2684, 4532, 15444, 19976e }}
 Badness: 0.0209
@@ Line 125: / Line 125: @@
 Optimal tuning (CTE): ~3/2 = 701.939
-Optiml GPV sequence: {{val list| 836, 1848, 2684, 7216, 9900, 12584 }}
+Optiml GPV sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 836, 1848, 2684, 7216, 9900, 12584 }}
 Badness: 0.0396
@@ Line 182: / Line 182: @@
 Optimal tuning (CTE): ~3/2 = 701.9431
-Vals: {{Val list| 224, 1848, 2072}}, ...
+{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 224, 1848, 2072}}, ...
 == 61st-octave temperaments ==
@@ Line 209: / Line 209: @@
 Optimal tuning (CTE): ~11907/6875 = 950.970
-Vals: {{EDOs|183, 2684}}, ...
+{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1|183, 2684}}, ...
 == 65th-octave temperaments ==
@@ Line 309: / Line 309: @@
 Optimal tuning (CTE): ~3/2 = 701.9...
-Vals: {{EDOs|3219c, 4884, 8103, 12987}}, ...
+{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1|3219c, 4884, 8103, 12987}}, ...
 == 118th-octave temperaments ==