Xenharmonic Wiki

Landscape microtemperaments: Difference between revisions

← Older editNewer edit →
VisualWikitext
Eliora (talk | contribs)
autopatrolled
3,351 edits
link noletaland from here
Cmloegcmluin (talk | contribs)
autopatrolled, emailconfirmed
5,160 edits
"optimal GPV sequence" → "optimal ET sequence", per Talk:Optimal_ET_sequence
Line 31: Line 31:
[[Optimal tuning]] ([[CTE]]): ~4096/3645 = 1\6, ~3/2 = 702.2347
[[Optimal tuning]] ([[CTE]]): ~4096/3645 = 1\6, ~3/2 = 702.2347


{{Val list|legend=1| 12, 234d, 246d, 258, 270, 1362c, 1632c, 1902c, 2172c, 2442bc, 2712bc }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 12, 234d, 246d, 258, 270, 1362c, 1632c, 1902c, 2172c, 2442bc, 2712bc }}


[[Badness]]: 0.070097
[[Badness]]: 0.070097
Line 44: Line 44:
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~55/49 = 1\6, ~3/2 = 702.2225
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~55/49 = 1\6, ~3/2 = 702.2225


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 12, 246dee, 258e, 270, 822, 1092, 1362c }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 12, 246dee, 258e, 270, 822, 1092, 1362c }}


Badness: 0.029677
Badness: 0.029677
Line 57: Line 57:
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~55/49 = 1\6, ~3/2 = 702.2141
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~55/49 = 1\6, ~3/2 = 702.2141


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 12f, 258ef, 270, 552, 822, 1092, 1914cde }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 12f, 258ef, 270, 552, 822, 1092, 1914cde }}


Badness: 0.0191
Badness: 0.0191
Line 70: Line 70:
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~55/49 = 1\6, ~3/2 = 702.2117
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~55/49 = 1\6, ~3/2 = 702.2117


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 12f, 270, 552g }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 12f, 270, 552g }}


Badness: 0.0209
Badness: 0.0209
Line 83: Line 83:
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~55/49 = 1\6, ~3/2 = 702.2118
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~55/49 = 1\6, ~3/2 = 702.2118


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 12f, 270, 552g, 822gg }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 12f, 270, 552g, 822gg }}


Badness: 0.0156
Badness: 0.0156
Line 96: Line 96:
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~55/49 = 1\6, ~3/2 = 702.2296
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~55/49 = 1\6, ~3/2 = 702.2296


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 12, 258e, 270 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 12, 258e, 270 }}


Badness: 0.0391
Badness: 0.0391
Line 109: Line 109:
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~55/49 = 1\6, ~3/2 = 702.2264
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~55/49 = 1\6, ~3/2 = 702.2264


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 12, 258e, 270 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 12, 258e, 270 }}


Badness: 0.0384
Badness: 0.0384
Line 122: Line 122:
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~55/49 = 1\6, ~3/2 = 702.2266
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~55/49 = 1\6, ~3/2 = 702.2266


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 12, 258e, 270 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 12, 258e, 270 }}


Badness: 0.0252
Badness: 0.0252
Line 137: Line 137:
[[Optimal tuning]] ([[POTE]]): ~63/50 = 1\3, ~243/224 = 140.367
[[Optimal tuning]] ([[POTE]]): ~63/50 = 1\3, ~243/224 = 140.367


{{Val list|legend=1| 60, 111, 171, 795, 966, 1137, 1308, 5403b, 6711b, 8019bc }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 60, 111, 171, 795, 966, 1137, 1308, 5403b, 6711b, 8019bc }}


[[Badness]]: 0.016814
[[Badness]]: 0.016814
Line 152: Line 152:
[[Optimal tuning]] ([[POTE]]): ~63/50 = 1\3, ~192/175 = 161.399
[[Optimal tuning]] ([[POTE]]): ~63/50 = 1\3, ~192/175 = 161.399


{{Val list|legend=1| 15, 141, 156, 171, 2409cd, 2580cd, …, 4461bccddd, 4632bccddd }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 15, 141, 156, 171, 2409cd, 2580cd, …, 4461bccddd, 4632bccddd }}


[[Badness]]: 0.045660
[[Badness]]: 0.045660
Line 169: Line 169:
[[Optimal tuning]] ([[POTE]]): ~63/50 = 1\3, ~10/9 = 182.467
[[Optimal tuning]] ([[POTE]]): ~63/50 = 1\3, ~10/9 = 182.467


{{Val list|legend=1| 171, 1164, 1335, 1506, 1677, 1848, 2019, 2190, 11943, 13962, 15981, 18000, 20019, 22038 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 171, 1164, 1335, 1506, 1677, 1848, 2019, 2190, 11943, 13962, 15981, 18000, 20019, 22038 }}


[[Badness]]: 0.013979
[[Badness]]: 0.013979
Line 184: Line 184:
[[Optimal tuning]] ([[POTE]]): ~63/50 = 1\3, ~1024/945 = 137.768
[[Optimal tuning]] ([[POTE]]): ~63/50 = 1\3, ~1024/945 = 137.768


{{Val list|legend=1| 87, 183, 270, 723, 993, 1263, 2796cd, 4059bccd }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 87, 183, 270, 723, 993, 1263, 2796cd, 4059bccd }}


[[Badness]]: 0.062187
[[Badness]]: 0.062187
Line 197: Line 197:
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~63/50 = 1\3, ~693/640 = 137.771
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~63/50 = 1\3, ~693/640 = 137.771


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 87, 183, 270, 1263, 1533, 1803c, 2073c }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 87, 183, 270, 1263, 1533, 1803c, 2073c }}


Badness: 0.023085
Badness: 0.023085
Line 210: Line 210:
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~63/50 = 1\3, ~13/12 = 137.777
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~63/50 = 1\3, ~13/12 = 137.777


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 87, 183, 270 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 87, 183, 270 }}


Badness: 0.015557
Badness: 0.015557
Line 223: Line 223:
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~63/50 = 1\3, ~13/12 = 137.777
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~63/50 = 1\3, ~13/12 = 137.777


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 87, 183, 270 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 87, 183, 270 }}


Badness: 0.015557
Badness: 0.015557
Line 236: Line 236:
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~63/50 = 1\3, ~13/12 = 137.777
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~63/50 = 1\3, ~13/12 = 137.777


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 87, 183, 270 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 87, 183, 270 }}


Badness: 0.015557
Badness: 0.015557
Line 251: Line 251:
[[Optimal tuning]] ([[POTE]]): ~63/50 = 1\3, ~392/375 = 75.555
[[Optimal tuning]] ([[POTE]]): ~63/50 = 1\3, ~392/375 = 75.555


{{Val list|legend=1| 111, 159, 270 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 111, 159, 270 }}


[[Badness]]: 0.087156
[[Badness]]: 0.087156
Line 264: Line 264:
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~63/50 = 1\3, ~392/375 = 75.550
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~63/50 = 1\3, ~392/375 = 75.550


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 111, 159, 270, 1239, 1509, 1779, 2049, 2319 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 111, 159, 270, 1239, 1509, 1779, 2049, 2319 }}


Badness: 0.029326
Badness: 0.029326
Line 277: Line 277:
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~63/50 = 1\3, ~117/112 = 75.553
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~63/50 = 1\3, ~117/112 = 75.553


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 111, 159, 270 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 111, 159, 270 }}


Badness: 0.018647
Badness: 0.018647
Line 290: Line 290:
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~63/50 = 1\3, ~117/112 = 75.560
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~63/50 = 1\3, ~117/112 = 75.560


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 111, 159, 270 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 111, 159, 270 }}


Badness: 0.018705
Badness: 0.018705
Line 303: Line 303:
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~63/50 = 1\3, ~95/91 = 75.560
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~63/50 = 1\3, ~95/91 = 75.560


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 111, 159, 270 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 111, 159, 270 }}


Badness: 0.013902
Badness: 0.013902
Line 316: Line 316:
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~63/50 = 1\3, ~24/23 = 75.548
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~63/50 = 1\3, ~24/23 = 75.548


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 111, 159, 270 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 111, 159, 270 }}


Badness: 0.014915
Badness: 0.014915
Line 335: Line 335:
[[Optimal tuning]] ([[CTE]]): ~1323/1280 = 1\21, ~131072/91875 = 614.9354
[[Optimal tuning]] ([[CTE]]): ~1323/1280 = 1\21, ~131072/91875 = 614.9354


[[Optimal GPV sequence]]: {{val list| 84, 273, 357, 441, 966, 1407, 1848, 7833, 9681, 11529, 13377c }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 84, 273, 357, 441, 966, 1407, 1848, 7833, 9681, 11529, 13377c }}


[[Badness]]: 0.0309
[[Badness]]: 0.0309
Line 352: Line 352:
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~1323/1280 = 1\21, ~6615/5632 = 278.8998
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~1323/1280 = 1\21, ~6615/5632 = 278.8998


Optimal GPV sequence: {{val list| 168, 357, 525, 882, 1407, 2289e }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 168, 357, 525, 882, 1407, 2289e }}


Badness: 0.0949
Badness: 0.0949
Line 365: Line 365:
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~336/325 = 1\21, ~168/143 = 278.9058
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~336/325 = 1\21, ~168/143 = 278.9058


Optimal GPV sequence: {{val list| 168, 357, 525, 882 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 168, 357, 525, 882 }}


Badness: 0.0551
Badness: 0.0551
Line 378: Line 378:
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~336/325 = 1\21, ~168/143 = 278.9036
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~336/325 = 1\21, ~168/143 = 278.9036


Optimal GPV sequence: {{val list| 168, 357, 525, 882 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 168, 357, 525, 882 }}


Badness: 0.0319
Badness: 0.0319
Line 391: Line 391:
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~336/325 = 1\21, ~168/143 = 278.9036
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~336/325 = 1\21, ~168/143 = 278.9036


Optimal GPV sequence: {{val list| 168h, 357, 525, 882, 1407 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 168h, 357, 525, 882, 1407 }}


Badness: 0.0270
Badness: 0.0270
Line 404: Line 404:
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~336/325 = 1\21, ~168/143 = 278.8971
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~336/325 = 1\21, ~168/143 = 278.8971


Optimal GPV sequence: {{val list| 168h, 357, 525, 882, 1407 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 168h, 357, 525, 882, 1407 }}


Badness: 0.0199
Badness: 0.0199
Line 437: Line 437:
[[Optimal tuning]] ([[CTE]]): ~250/243 = 1\24, ~10/7 = 617.2710
[[Optimal tuning]] ([[CTE]]): ~250/243 = 1\24, ~10/7 = 617.2710


{{Val list|legend=1| 72, …, 480, 552, 624, 1320, 1944d, 3264d }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 72, …, 480, 552, 624, 1320, 1944d, 3264d }}


[[Badness]]: 0.139
[[Badness]]: 0.139
Line 450: Line 450:
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~250/243 = 1\24, ~10/7 = 617.2597
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~250/243 = 1\24, ~10/7 = 617.2597


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 72, …, 480, 552, 624 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 72, …, 480, 552, 624 }}


Badness: 0.0398
Badness: 0.0398
Line 463: Line 463:
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~250/243 = 1\24, ~10/7 = 617.2869
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~250/243 = 1\24, ~10/7 = 617.2869


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 72, …, 480f, 552, 624, 1176de, 1800cdee }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 72, …, 480f, 552, 624, 1176de, 1800cdee }}


Badness: 0.0293
Badness: 0.0293
Line 476: Line 476:
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~35/34 = 1\24, ~10/7 = 617.2732
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~35/34 = 1\24, ~10/7 = 617.2732


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 72, …, 480fgg, 552g, 624 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 72, …, 480fgg, 552g, 624 }}


Badness: 0.0209
Badness: 0.0209
Retrieved from "https://en.xen.wiki/w/Landscape_microtemperaments"