Talk:Ripple family: Difference between revisions
Cmloegcmluin (talk | contribs) |
Cmloegcmluin (talk | contribs) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
:: What I meant was: I don't already understand this fact. Perhaps for "one" it might be self-evident, but I (and perhaps others) fall outside the scope of this "one". Is there some way to demonstrate or explain this connection between 12edo and ripple? --[[User:Cmloegcmluin|Cmloegcmluin]] ([[User talk:Cmloegcmluin|talk]]) 14:42, 21 May 2021 (UTC) | :: What I meant was: I don't already understand this fact. Perhaps for "one" it might be self-evident, but I (and perhaps others) fall outside the scope of this "one". Is there some way to demonstrate or explain this connection between 12edo and ripple? --[[User:Cmloegcmluin|Cmloegcmluin]] ([[User talk:Cmloegcmluin|talk]]) 14:42, 21 May 2021 (UTC) | ||
::: So we've decomposed the comma as "equates a stack of four 10/9's with 8/5". For perhaps an average RTT user, it's hard enough to name any other edo that satisfies that, not to mention being a better 5-limit tuning. [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 05:03, 22 May 2021 (UTC) | |||
=== Beginner question === | === Beginner question === | ||
| Line 12: | Line 14: | ||
: Notice that 2/1, 10/9 and 8/5 only span 2.9.5, where a 200 cent generator does work. In 2.3.5, however, the generator must be split to give you the harmonic 3. [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 04:02, 21 May 2021 (UTC) | : Notice that 2/1, 10/9 and 8/5 only span 2.9.5, where a 200 cent generator does work. In 2.3.5, however, the generator must be split to give you the harmonic 3. [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 04:02, 21 May 2021 (UTC) | ||
:: Thanks for this! That makes sense, and gives me some interesting further questions to look into. --[[User:Cmloegcmluin|Cmloegcmluin]] ([[User talk:Cmloegcmluin|talk]]) 15:12, 22 May 2021 (UTC) | |||