Talk:64/63: Difference between revisions

Xenwolf (talk | contribs)
re (added section)
Naming: Leipiger Komma removal
 
(7 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 4: Line 4:


: For German people "Leipziger Komma" would be the easiest name to remember and pronounce. But in a mathematical of functional sense all the names are just noise. 😉 --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 16:17, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
: For German people "Leipziger Komma" would be the easiest name to remember and pronounce. But in a mathematical of functional sense all the names are just noise. 😉 --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 16:17, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
:: Just did a Google search after [[User:FloraC|FloraC]]'s removal of "Leipziger Komma" from the list of names, and indeed the only instance of this name that came up was the German Wikipedia article "[https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Komma_(Musik) Komma (Musik)]", and it listed this name but gave no reference (it has no references at all).  [[User:Lucius Chiaraviglio|Lucius Chiaraviglio]] ([[User talk:Lucius Chiaraviglio|talk]]) 15:21, 20 June 2025 (UTC)
== Organization, and the Archytas comma as a musical interval in its own right ==
Instead of saying "On the other hand, if one should be so bold as to treat the Archytas' comma as a musical interval in its own right", it would be better to reorganize this article after the example of the [[128/125|Diesis]], which has an Approximations section, and following that a Temperaments section which has sub-sections for "As a comma" and "As an interval" (and while we're at it, can we get it a non-comma name?).  After all, NOT tempering out the Archytas comma is a requirement for many septimal temperaments to work properly, where tempering it out results in a d (or even dd) val, although in equal divisions of the octave smaller than 44EDO, it will unavoidably be inflated.
[[User:Lucius Chiaraviglio|Lucius Chiaraviglio]] ([[User talk:Lucius Chiaraviglio|talk]]) 19:06, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
: I think I'd have to say that 64/63 could be called either the "Archytas Greater Superprime" or the "Archytas Narrow Inframinor Second" depending on whether it functions as a prime or a second. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 20:28, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
== Complete the Sagittal Notation? ==
Showing the symbol for Sagittal Notation down by this interval is nice, but it would be good to put the Sagittal Notation up for this interval.  Unfortunately, I haven't yet figured out how to reference the right symbol myself.  [[User:Lucius Chiaraviglio|Lucius Chiaraviglio]] ([[User talk:Lucius Chiaraviglio|talk]]) 07:13, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
: Good idea. Done. [[User:Dave Keenan|Dave Keenan]] ([[User talk:Dave Keenan|talk]]) 12:17, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
:: Lucius, thank you for the nudge to improve the documentation. The [[Sagitype]] article should help you with learning how to make {{sagittal | |) }} yourself. Please let me know if you still have questions. --[[User:Cmloegcmluin|Cmloegcmluin]] ([[User talk:Cmloegcmluin|talk]]) 15:39, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
::: Thank you very much -- this is quite helpful.  It should be made more widely known.  [[User:Lucius Chiaraviglio|Lucius Chiaraviglio]] ([[User talk:Lucius Chiaraviglio|talk]]) 07:21, 10 October 2024 (UTC)
Return to "64/63" page.