Ed7/3: Difference between revisions

From Xenharmonic Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Lériendil (talk | contribs)
m ed7/3s in the 100s are all deleted now
Lériendil (talk | contribs)
m removed redlink
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 9: Line 9:


== Chords and harmonies ==
== Chords and harmonies ==
{{main|Pseudo-traditional harmonic functions of enneatonic scale degrees}}
[[:Category:9-tone scales|Enneatonic scale]]s, especially those equivalent at 7/3, can sensibly take [[tetrad]]s as the fundamental complete sonorities of a pseudo-traditional functional harmony due to their seventh degree being as structurally important as it is. Many, though not all, of these scales have a perceptually important [[Pseudo-octave|pseudo (false) octave]], with various degrees of accuracy.
[[:Category:9-tone scales|Enneatonic scale]]s, especially those equivalent at 7/3, can sensibly take [[tetrad]]s as the fundamental complete sonorities of a pseudo-traditional functional harmony due to their seventh degree being as structurally important as it is. Many, though not all, of these scales have a perceptually important [[Pseudo-octave|pseudo (false) octave]], with various degrees of accuracy.


Incidentally, one way to treat 7/3 as an equivalence is the use of the 3:4:5:(7) chord as the fundamental complete sonority in a very similar way to the 4:5:6:(8) chord in [[meantone]]. Whereas in meantone it takes four [[3/2]] to get to [[5/1]], here it takes two [[28/15]] to get to [[7/2]] (tempering out the comma [[225/224]]). So, doing this yields 15-, 19-, and 34-note [[mos]] 2/1 apart. While the notes are rather farther apart, the scheme is uncannily similar to meantone. [[Joseph Ruhf]] named this scheme "macrobichromatic".
Incidentally, one way to treat 7/3 as an equivalence is the use of the 3:4:5:(7) chord as the fundamental complete sonority in a very similar way to the 4:5:6:(8) chord in [[meantone]].


== Individual pages for ed7/3's ==
== Individual pages for ed7/3's ==

Latest revision as of 21:27, 13 May 2026

Todo: cleanup, explain edonoi

Most people do not think 7/3 sounds like an equivalence, so there must be some other reason why people are dividing it — some property other than equivalence that makes people want to divide it. Please add to this page an explanation of what that reason is... The page also needs a general overall cleanup.

The equal division of 7/3 (ed7/3) is a tuning obtained by dividing the septimal minor tenth (7/3) in a certain number of equal steps.

Applications

Division of 7/3 into equal parts does not necessarily imply directly using this interval as an equivalence. Many, though not all, ed7/3 scales have a perceptually important false octave, with various degrees of accuracy.

The structural utility of 7/3 (or another tenth) is apparent by being the absolute widest range most generally used in popular songs[citation needed] (and even the range of a dastgah[citation needed]).

Chords and harmonies

Enneatonic scales, especially those equivalent at 7/3, can sensibly take tetrads as the fundamental complete sonorities of a pseudo-traditional functional harmony due to their seventh degree being as structurally important as it is. Many, though not all, of these scales have a perceptually important pseudo (false) octave, with various degrees of accuracy.

Incidentally, one way to treat 7/3 as an equivalence is the use of the 3:4:5:(7) chord as the fundamental complete sonority in a very similar way to the 4:5:6:(8) chord in meantone.

Individual pages for ed7/3's

0…99
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39
40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49
50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59
60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69
70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79
80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89
90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99