Talk:Garibaldi: Difference between revisions
→Pointlessly small MOS scales: added more |
→Pointlessly small MOS scales: no deletions |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
I would personally also delete [[Cotoneum17]] and possibly even [[Cotoneum29]]. Near-pythagorean temperament MOS scales with too few notes to contain much in higher limits are pointless, and one may as well just use pythagorean tuning instead, which has MOS pages up to 53. Also scales with more notes should be added, like [[Garibaldi29]] and [[Garibaldi41]]. There are also temperaments like [[harry]] where smaller MOS scales need to be added, like [[Harry44]] and possibly also [[Harry30]]. --[[User:Overthink|Overthink]] ([[User talk:Overthink|talk]]) 20:23, 22 November 2025 (UTC) | I would personally also delete [[Cotoneum17]] and possibly even [[Cotoneum29]]. Near-pythagorean temperament MOS scales with too few notes to contain much in higher limits are pointless, and one may as well just use pythagorean tuning instead, which has MOS pages up to 53. Also scales with more notes should be added, like [[Garibaldi29]] and [[Garibaldi41]]. There are also temperaments like [[harry]] where smaller MOS scales need to be added, like [[Harry44]] and possibly also [[Harry30]]. --[[User:Overthink|Overthink]] ([[User talk:Overthink|talk]]) 20:23, 22 November 2025 (UTC) | ||
: Now that I think of it, I'm actually against the deletions, though I definitely support adding Garibaldi29 and Garibaldi41. I'm not sure about Harry44 and Harry30. --[[User:Overthink|Overthink]] ([[User talk:Overthink|talk]]) 17:27, 23 November 2025 (UTC) | |||