User talk:Nick Vuci/Xenharmonics: Difference between revisions

Xenjacob (talk | contribs)
Created page with "== Co-signers/endorsements idea == It seems like this document has alliance alignment potential. Perhaps if there were a way for microtonalists to co-sign or endorse these statements, it could carry more weight and be promoted out of userspace that way? However that were implemented, put me on the list. ~~~"
 
No edit summary
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 4: Line 4:


However that were implemented, put me on the list. [[User:Xenjacob|Xenjacob]] ([[User talk:Xenjacob|talk]])
However that were implemented, put me on the list. [[User:Xenjacob|Xenjacob]] ([[User talk:Xenjacob|talk]])
== Moving to main ==
I'm in favor of moving this to main, but I guess the question is, would it remain an essay (in which case the article should mention you as the author) or just a freely editable article?
I believe the latter is really the only option for mainspace, but it's up to you.
EDIT: Another option is to merge the relevant portions into [[microtonal music]], which is a high priority article that really needs some work.
– [[User:Sintel|Sintel🎏]] ([[User_talk:Sintel|talk]]) 12:48, 11 April 2025 (UTC)
* I support merging the article. It's primarily informative for the sake of understanding of the history of microtonal and xenharmonic music. [[User:Lériendil|Lériendil]] ([[User talk:Lériendil|talk]]) 15:36, 11 April 2025 (UTC)
== Clarify that this is Nick Vuci's personal usage of the term ==
The usage of "xenharmonics" varies quite a bit from what Nick has specified. --[[User:VectorGraphics|VectorGraphics]] ([[User talk:VectorGraphics|talk]]) 22:32, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
Return to the user page of "Nick Vuci/Xenharmonics".