Talk:299/289: Difference between revisions

Inisil (talk | contribs)
m discussion answer
BudjarnLambeth (talk | contribs)
mNo edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 5: Line 5:
   
   
:The problem is I named this comma "unidecimisma" because I was under wrong impression that it's the first useful comma appearing in sequence after 11th harmonic, only because I initially checked too little prime factors before I concluded that. But even in 23-limit there's also 253/247 which is better for this, and none of them should be called "unidecismisma". I don't know how to call this comma really, if it will be called, 253/247 should have name too.--[[User:Inisil|Iniðil]] ([[User talk:Inisil|talk]]) 23:28, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
:The problem is I named this comma "unidecimisma" because I was under wrong impression that it's the first useful comma appearing in sequence after 11th harmonic, only because I initially checked too little prime factors before I concluded that. But even in 23-limit there's also 253/247 which is better for this, and none of them should be called "unidecismisma". I don't know how to call this comma really, if it will be called, 253/247 should have name too.--[[User:Inisil|Iniðil]] ([[User talk:Inisil|talk]]) 23:28, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
::No worries, that makes sense :) In that case I will put it in [[:Category:Commas with placeholder names]] Thanks for explaining. --[[User:BudjarnLambeth|BudjarnLambeth]] ([[User talk:BudjarnLambeth|talk]]) 01:05, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
Return to "299/289" page.