Talk:Periodic scale: Difference between revisions

Inthar (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Inthar (talk | contribs)
 
(10 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
I'd like the page to mention the two ways of writing a periodic scale as a function:
== The step form of a scale ==
# The ''cumulative form'' (the formalization on the article), a monotone increasing function <math>S: \mathbb{Z}\to \mathbb{R}</math> such that ''S''(0) = '''0''' (unison) and ''S''(''k'' len(''S'')) = ''k'''''E''' where '''E''' is the equave.
I'd like the page to mention the two most standard ways of writing a periodic scale as a function:
# The ''step form'', related to the above via Δ''S''(''k'') = ''S''(''k'' + 1) &minus; ''S''(''k''), which is nonnegative and periodic in the usual math sense.
# The ''cumulative form'' (the formalization in the article), a monotone increasing function <math>S: \mathbb{Z}\to \mathbb{R}</math> such that ''S''(0) = 0 (unison) and ''S''(''k'' + len(''S'')) = ''S''(''k'') + ''E'' where ''E'' is the equave.
We can also mention scales considered more abstractly, <math>S: \mathbb{Z}\to A</math> where ''A'' is any abelian group such as <math>\mathbb{R}</math> (log-frequency interval space), a free abelian group on steps, or a JI subgroup.
# The ''step form'', the sequence of steps in the scale, related to the above via Δ''S''(''k'') = ''S''(''k'' + 1) &minus; ''S''(''k''), which is nonnegative and periodic in the usual math sense.
The latter form is implicit when regarding scales as scale words.
 
We could also mention scales considered more abstractly, <math>S: \mathbb{Z}\to A</math> where ''A'' is any torsion-free abelian group such as <math>\mathbb{R}</math> (log-frequency interval space), a free abelian group on steps, or a JI subgroup.
[[User:Inthar|Inthar]] ([[User talk:Inthar|talk]]) 16:33, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
[[User:Inthar|Inthar]] ([[User talk:Inthar|talk]]) 16:33, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Return to "Periodic scale" page.