User talk:BudjarnLambeth: Difference between revisions

(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)

Line 22:

: Before I touched the 91edo article, it had lalagu (12 & 97) and didn't have meantone. I figured there was probably some special reason why that was the case and didn't want to mess it up so that's why I left lalagu in place. Feel free to change whatever needs to be changed to make the articles accurate. --[[User:BudjarnLambeth|BudjarnLambeth]] ([[User talk:BudjarnLambeth|talk]]) 09:43, 25 November 2023 (UTC)

== Octave numbering and exponents ==

Budjarn, I just came across your latest edits to the 128afdo page, where we read that the 8th Octave Overtone Tuning

''"…consists of harmonics of the harmonic series, numbers 128 (28, hence 8th octave) through 255."''

The octave number 8 is fine, but the exponent in ''(28, hence 8th octave)'' should be (8-1) = 7 instead of 8 – do you agree? (The Infobox AFDO calculates correctly.)

All the best - Holger ([[User:Holger Stoltenberg|Holger Stoltenberg]] ([[User talk:Holger Stoltenberg|talk]]) 16:50, 15 January 2025 (UTC))

:: I agree. That part of the text was actually not added by me, it was added on 08:41, 10 February 2020 by the page’s original author. Nonetheless I will correct it now. Thank you for pointing it out :) Kind regards, --[[User:BudjarnLambeth|BudjarnLambeth]] ([[User talk:BudjarnLambeth|talk]]) 01:59, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

@@ Line 22: / Line 22: @@
 : Before I touched the 91edo article, it had lalagu (12 & 97) and didn't have meantone. I figured there was probably some special reason why that was the case and didn't want to mess it up so that's why I left lalagu in place. Feel free to change whatever needs to be changed to make the articles accurate. --[[User:BudjarnLambeth|BudjarnLambeth]] ([[User talk:BudjarnLambeth|talk]]) 09:43, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
+== Octave numbering and exponents ==
+Budjarn, I just came across your latest edits to the 128afdo page, where we read that the 8th Octave Overtone Tuning
+''"…consists of harmonics of the harmonic series, numbers 128 (2<sup>8</sup>, hence 8<sup>th</sup> octave) through 255."''<br>
+The octave number 8 is fine, but the exponent in ''(2<sup>8</sup>, hence 8<sup>th</sup> octave)'' should be (8-1) = 7 instead of 8 – do you agree? <br>(The Infobox AFDO calculates correctly.)<br>
+All the best - Holger ([[User:Holger Stoltenberg|Holger Stoltenberg]] ([[User talk:Holger Stoltenberg|talk]]) 16:50, 15 January 2025 (UTC))
+:: I agree. That part of the text was actually not added by me, it was added on 08:41, 10 February 2020 by the page’s original author. Nonetheless I will correct it now. Thank you for pointing it out :) Kind regards, --[[User:BudjarnLambeth|BudjarnLambeth]] ([[User talk:BudjarnLambeth|talk]]) 01:59, 16 January 2025 (UTC)