Abc, high quality commas, and epimericity: Difference between revisions
Wikispaces>genewardsmith **Imported revision 362842988 - Original comment: ** |
No edit summary |
||
| (32 intermediate revisions by 9 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{inacc}} | |||
{{todo|intro|inline=1}} | |||
{{DISPLAYTITLE:''abc'', high quality commas, and epimericity}} | |||
== Epimericity == | |||
If ''n''/''d'' > 1 is a rational number in simplest form, we may define the ''epimericity'' of ''n''/''d'' in terms of cents as cents(''n'' - ''d'')/cents(''d'') - that is, for an example 9/7, n-d is 2 and d is 7, so we end up with roughly 1200/3369 or 0.356. (Note that using other logarithms is possible, but the result is still the same due to the bases cancelling out). Then it appears to be true that [[wikipedia: størmer's theorem|Størmer's theorem]] generalizes to a claim that for any prime ''p'', only finitely many rational numbers in the ''p''-limit exist with epimericity less than or equal to any constant ''c'' less than one. Hence a particular finite subset of commas in any ''p''-limit can be defined as those below a given epimericity, such as the 7-limit commas under 0.5 in epimericity, or the 11-limit commas under 0.3; these are considered "interesting" according to a value judgment whose nature is not known. | |||
This conjecture is related to the | == ''abc'' conjecture == | ||
This conjecture is related to the [[Wikipedia: abc conjecture|''abc'' conjecture]], and a related claim is in fact precisely the ''abc'' conjecture, which defines what we may call a ''high quality comma''. Define the ''radical'' rad (''n''/''d'') of ''n''/''d'' as the product of all the primes dividing ''n'', ''d'', and ''n'' - ''d''; so that rad (128/125) = 2×3×5 = 30. Then define the ''quality'' q (''n''/''d'') of ''n''/''d'' as log (''n'')/log (rad (''n''/''d'')). Then the ''abc'' conjecture, a very powerful conjecture, says that for any ϵ > 0 there are only finitely many commas such that q (''n''/''d'') > 1 + ϵ, where we may assume without loss of generality that ''n''/''d'' < 2 so that it is an actual comma. Any comma with q (''n''/''d'') > 1 we may call "high quality"; there are an infinite number of these, but the conjecture is that there are only finitely many above any value greater than 1. High quality commas in the 5-limit include 250/243, 128/125, 3125/3072, 81/80 and 2048/2025. It should be noted that while every superparticular ratio has an epimericity of 0, merely being superparticular is by no means enough to make a comma high quality; the list of high-quality superparticulars starts 9/8, 49/48, 64/63, 81/80, 225/224, 243/242 ... . | |||
== DoReMi conjecture == | |||
Since not much musical meaning seems to attach to the commas dividing ''n'' - ''d'', it makes sense for our purposes to modify the definition of quality. Let doremi (''n''/''d'') = log (''n'')/log ((''n'' - ''d'') radical(''nd'')), where radical (''nd'') is the product of the primes dividing ''nd''. Then q (''n''/''d'') ≤ doremi (''n''/''d''), so that the condition that doremi (''n''/''d'') > 1 + ϵ is stronger than q (''n''/''d'') > 1 + ϵ, and there will be fewer intervals which qualify. This means that if the list of q (''n''/''d'') > 1 + ϵ is finite, so is the list of doremi (''n''/''d'') > 1 + ϵ. So ''abc'' implies DoReMi but the converse is not true; DoReMi is a slightly weaker conjecture that is also unproven (according to Noam Elkies and [http://math.stackexchange.com/a/235373 Stack Overflow]). Aside from its clearer music theory implications, DoReMi is enormously easier to compute if ''n''/''d'' is in some small ''p''-limit, as then the computation of radical (''nd'') involves only small primes. A comma ''n''/''d'' with doremi (''n''/''d'') > 1 may be called a DoReMi comma. | |||
The DoReMi commas with numerator less than 1000 are 32/27, 9/8, 256/243, 250/243, 128/125, 49/48, 64/63, 81/80, 512/507, 245/243, 225/224, 243/242, 289/288, 513/512, 625/624, 676/675, 729/728 and 961/960. Note that large powers of small primes are favored, so that commas such as 512/507 are on the list. | |||
== See also == | |||
* [[Superpartient]] | |||
== External links == | |||
* [https://yahootuninggroupsultimatebackup.github.io/tuning-math/topicId_4458.html Seven and eleven limit comma lists] | |||
* [https://yahootuninggroupsultimatebackup.github.io/tuning-math/topicId_5556.html An 11-limit linear temperament top 100 list] | |||
[[Category:Comma]] | |||
[[Category:Math]] | |||
{{Todo| intro }} | |||