Syntonic–rastmic subchroma notation: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The '''syntonic-rastmic subchroma notation''' is a notation scheme developed by [[Aura]] et al.<ref>Other contributors include [[Flora Canou]] and [[User:SupahstarSaga|HEHEHE I AM A SUPAHSTAR SAGA]].</ref> that is an expansion to the [[neutral circle-of-fifths notation]]. | The '''syntonic-rastmic subchroma notation''' is a notation scheme developed by [[Aura]] et al.<ref>Other contributors include [[Flora Canou]] and [[User:SupahstarSaga|HEHEHE I AM A SUPAHSTAR SAGA]].</ref> that is an expansion to the [[neutral circle-of-fifths notation]]. | ||
While the neutral circle-of-fifths notation models the 2.3 [[subgroup]] of [[just intonation]], with the neutral intervals capable of roughly modeling the harmonic 11, the syntonic-rastmic subchroma notation accurately captures the characteristics of the 2.3.5.11 subgroup, and is fit for a wider variety of equal temperaments and multirank temperaments. As it tries to strike a balance between the number and semantic consistency of the accidentals, it has the following three basic building blocks of accidentals: the conventional accidentals, the syntonic accidentals, and the rastmic and demirastmic accidentals, detailed below. | While the neutral circle-of-fifths notation models the 2.3 [[subgroup]] of [[just intonation]], with the neutral intervals capable of roughly modeling the harmonic 11, the syntonic-rastmic subchroma notation accurately captures the characteristics of the 2.3.5.11 subgroup, and is fit for a wider variety of equal temperaments and multirank temperaments. As it tries to strike a balance between the number and semantic consistency of the accidentals, it has the following three basic building blocks of accidentals: the conventional accidentals, the syntonic and demisyntonic accidentals, and the rastmic and demirastmic accidentals, detailed below. | ||
== Accidentals == | == Accidentals == |