Talk:31st-octave temperaments: Difference between revisions

← Older edit Newer edit →

VisualWikitext

Revision as of 12:49, 24 February 2022 view source Xenwolf (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled, Bureaucrats, confirmaccount-notify, Interface administrators, Sysops 8,705 edits →Bold lemma?: bold isn't as important ← Older edit		Revision as of 13:11, 24 February 2022 view source Xenwolf (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled, Bureaucrats, confirmaccount-notify, Interface administrators, Sysops 8,705 edits →Bold lemma?: thx Newer edit →
Line 21:		Line 21:

	:: I saw that the page was moved to this lemma and wondered if the current name is really the best choice. So I took a look at the article and found the term "31st octave" neither mentioned nor explained here. To be more specific, I have no trouble with the word "temperaments" at all, but simply wish that some explanation of the term "31st octave" would come out of the article. Thank you in advance for this! --[[User:Xenwolf\|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf\|talk]]) 12:49, 24 February 2022 (UTC)		:: I saw that the page was moved to this lemma and wondered if the current name is really the best choice. So I took a look at the article and found the term "31st octave" neither mentioned nor explained here. To be more specific, I have no trouble with the word "temperaments" at all, but simply wish that some explanation of the term "31st octave" would come out of the article. Thank you in advance for this! --[[User:Xenwolf\|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf\|talk]]) 12:49, 24 February 2022 (UTC)

			::: Thanks for helping me understand. BTW: Did you know that subpages are disabled for the article namespace? So even "1/31 octave" would have been possible. Maybe for English natives this isn't a problem, but I'm often confused by the duality of ordinals and fractions. --[[User:Xenwolf\|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf\|talk]]) 13:11, 24 February 2022 (UTC)