Talk:Meet and join: Difference between revisions

Line 123:

::::::::: The feeling about combativeness is certainly mutual. Thanks for your assessment that I didn't use & enough to problematize your proposal. I'm not going to respond to the other post. [[User:Mike Battaglia|Mike Battaglia]] ([[User talk:Mike Battaglia|talk]]) 07:08, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

:::::::::: I just stated that I'm not intending to be combative. You've here chosen to implicitly reject believing me about that, and furthermore, recognize that you ''are'' behaving combatively. And you say these things in a snide way. So, I'll say this explicitly: I wish you would not act combatively with me in the future, and also behave friendlily.

:::::::::: This wasn't my proposal, if you recall; It was Sintel's, and he persuaded me and Dave with his strong, well-presented ideas. You're clearly thanking me sarcastically here, but I can't understand why you would be upset that we successfully identified that the scope of a potential obstacle to this proposal was limited enough so as not to problematize it, and therefore we had a good solution to this pedagogical issue. I know that of the four of us discussing here, this solution poses the greatest inconvenience to you, and and I can see that I haven't sufficiently expressed my sympathy and gratitude that you're taking this one for the team. So: thank you for your sacrifice here. I appreciate it.

:::::::::: I'll just go ahead and reply to your other comment here so we don't have multiple threads going on at once.

:::::::::: The fact that you're spent your time quibbling about the strength of the language I used at one point or another to recommend that you get input from the community in the ways it has specifically positioned itself to invite such input, rather than just actually getting this feedback, indicates to me that really don't really respect me or the community or care if we end up with the best results for everyone here. You just have your own inflexible ideas about exactly which and how much feedback is appropriate.

:::::::::: You also ignored all the stuff I said about collaboration and tone and friendship, etc. so this suggests to me that have no intention to behave more friendlily toward me. I hope that's not the case.

:::::::::: I think it would be best for me to excuse myself from this conversation at this point. Feel free to say whatever you want to say to clarify things on your end, but I don't think I have anything more to say at this time. Thanks again for your contributions to this topic. --[[User:Cmloegcmluin|Cmloegcmluin]] ([[User talk:Cmloegcmluin|talk]]) 14:13, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

== Suggestion to add a helpful image ==

@@ Line 123: / Line 123: @@
 ::::::::: The feeling about combativeness is certainly mutual. Thanks for your assessment that I didn't use & enough to problematize your proposal. I'm not going to respond to the other post. [[User:Mike Battaglia|Mike Battaglia]] ([[User talk:Mike Battaglia|talk]]) 07:08, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
+:::::::::: I just stated that I'm not intending to be combative. You've here chosen to implicitly reject believing me about that, and furthermore, recognize that you ''are'' behaving combatively. And you say these things in a snide way. So, I'll say this explicitly: I wish you would not act combatively with me in the future, and also behave friendlily.
+:::::::::: This wasn't my proposal, if you recall; It was Sintel's, and he persuaded me and Dave with his strong, well-presented ideas. You're clearly thanking me sarcastically here, but I can't understand why you would be upset that we successfully identified that the scope of a potential obstacle to this proposal was limited enough so as not to problematize it, and therefore we had a good solution to this pedagogical issue. I know that of the four of us discussing here, this solution poses the greatest inconvenience to you, and and I can see that I haven't sufficiently expressed my sympathy and gratitude that you're taking this one for the team. So: thank you for your sacrifice here. I appreciate it.
+:::::::::: I'll just go ahead and reply to your other comment here so we don't have multiple threads going on at once.
+:::::::::: The fact that you're spent your time quibbling about the strength of the language I used at one point or another to recommend that you get input from the community in the ways it has specifically positioned itself to invite such input, rather than just actually getting this feedback, indicates to me that really don't really respect me or the community or care if we end up with the best results for everyone here. You just have your own inflexible ideas about exactly which and how much feedback is appropriate.
+:::::::::: You also ignored all the stuff I said about collaboration and tone and friendship, etc. so this suggests to me that have no intention to behave more friendlily toward me. I hope that's not the case.
+:::::::::: I think it would be best for me to excuse myself from this conversation at this point. Feel free to say whatever you want to say to clarify things on your end, but I don't think I have anything more to say at this time. Thanks again for your contributions to this topic. --[[User:Cmloegcmluin|Cmloegcmluin]] ([[User talk:Cmloegcmluin|talk]]) 14:13, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
 == Suggestion to add a helpful image ==