Talk:Online platforms: Difference between revisions
→Why the table?: re |
|||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
: PS: Please don't move the [[MuseScore]] content to here. --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 10:47, 4 July 2021 (UTC) | : PS: Please don't move the [[MuseScore]] content to here. --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 10:47, 4 July 2021 (UTC) | ||
== Why the table? == | |||
I expected it to be easy to move the existing articles into sections one-by-one? What is the benefit of a table here? Not having whole sentences any more? --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 23:06, 4 July 2021 (UTC) | |||
: After I tried to move the articles into sections, I noticed that it wasn't easy to compare the platforms in terms of what they offer (hence the Services column), especially if you take the point of view of someone who doesn't know all of them. Also, yes, I think that sentences like an "SoundCloud is an online platform dedicated to music and sounds" aren't very efficient or informative in this regard. That said, if the table causes any trouble, I don't really mind making sections instead. [[User:Fredg999|Fredg999]] ([[User talk:Fredg999|talk]]) 23:55, 4 July 2021 (UTC) | |||
:: Okay I see, If we delete the few whole sentence(s) which get redundant here, a table makes sense. Whta I missed most was the [[MuseScore]] link. --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 05:30, 5 July 2021 (UTC) | |||