Talk:Radical interval: Difference between revisions
Cmloegcmluin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
m More talk. |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
: Thanks for the explanation. Well that makes sense to me, but what you've just described seems to only be a fractional monzo, the idea described in the introduction section of this page. It then goes on to define eigenmonzo as something that builds upon that concept. At least that's what it seems like to me. If fractional monzo = eigenmonzo, if it's that simple, then I think the page could be made a bit clearer. --[[User:Cmloegcmluin|Cmloegcmluin]] ([[User talk:Cmloegcmluin|talk]]) 22:11, 16 April 2021 (UTC) | : Thanks for the explanation. Well that makes sense to me, but what you've just described seems to only be a fractional monzo, the idea described in the introduction section of this page. It then goes on to define eigenmonzo as something that builds upon that concept. At least that's what it seems like to me. If fractional monzo = eigenmonzo, if it's that simple, then I think the page could be made a bit clearer. --[[User:Cmloegcmluin|Cmloegcmluin]] ([[User talk:Cmloegcmluin|talk]]) 22:11, 16 April 2021 (UTC) | ||
:: Often the way with maths. Simple concepts that lead to very complicated implications when you iterate upon them. The clever stuff comes when you combine several fractional monzos to create an eigenmonzo that hits lots of near-just intervals in a small number of notes, as in miracle. Getting the numbers for all those various minmax and least squares tunings properly computed can be a real pain. --[[User:Yourmusic Productions|Yourmusic Productions]] ([[User talk:Yourmusic Productions|talk]]) 08:03, 17 April 2021 (UTC) |