|
|
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| = ARCHIVED WIKISPACES DISCUSSION BELOW =
| | {{WSArchiveLink}} |
| '''All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.'''
| |
| ----
| |
| | |
| == cents are wrong? ==
| |
| In the "Super-symmetric model with non-aliquot division of 65/64" section, in the C-F cents table, some of the numbers in the righthand columns seem to be 100¢ too low.
| |
| | |
| - '''TallKite''' November 17, 2015, 04:12:51 PM UTC-0800
| |
| ----
| |
| I think you are right. BTW: Are these "addition tables" really that helpful?
| |
| | |
| - '''xenwolf''' November 18, 2015, 03:43:15 AM UTC-0800
| |
| ----
| |
| Indeed! Seen and fixed it. Thanks for the observation!
| |
| | |
| Dunno how helpful the tables are. In the original writings by Julian Weiss and Stafan Pohlit, there were only the ascending and descending interval rations, and it took me quite a while to understand what the idea was. I think the tables are not that bad visualizing the positions of the possible pitches . but better ways might be around, of course. Any ideas?
| |
| | |
| - '''hstraub''' November 19, 2015, 01:37:09 AM UTC-0800
| |
| ----
| |
| The cents tables are really good to have, IMO.
| |
| | |
| - '''TallKite''' November 19, 2015, 03:20:56 AM UTC-0800
| |
| ----
| |
