|
|
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| = ARCHIVED WIKISPACES DISCUSSION BELOW =
| | {{WSArchiveLink}} |
| '''All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.'''
| |
| | |
| <span style="color:#800000">'''PLEASE MAKE ANY NEW COMMENTS <u>ABOVE</u> THIS SECTION.'''</span> Anything below here is for archival purposes only.
| |
| | |
| ----
| |
| | |
| == Pade(2,1) ==
| |
| Have you taken a look at the Pade(2,1) approximant? I compute it as $\frac{1}{4} \frac{(r-1)(r+5)}{2r+1}$. Calculations show it beats the quadratic approximant on the interval $[1,4]$ at the endpoints of which the two approximants agree. (The two are nearly identical on that interval, with a max difference of $\approx .006$.) The approximants are fairly simple (generally simpler than the Pade(1,2) approximants). E.g. for r = 2/1 we have the approximant 7/5 (ignoring the constant 1/4). A first computation shows that this approximation spots 34EDO by comparing the approximants for 5/4 and 3/2: 25/56 and 13/16 resp. We don't get equality, but minimizing the difference m*(13/16)-n*(25/56) gives m=11, n=20 with 11*(13/16) - 20*(25/56) = 1/112, a unit fraction with denominator the LCM of the approximant denominators.
| |
| | |
| - '''mattyhawthorn''' April 04, 2015, 05:08:22 PM UTC-0700
| |
| ----
| |