|
|
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| = ARCHIVED WIKISPACES DISCUSSION BELOW =
| | {{WSArchiveLink}} |
| '''All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.'''
| |
| | |
| <span style="color:#800000">'''PLEASE MAKE ANY NEW COMMENTS <u>ABOVE</u> THIS SECTION.'''</span> Anything below here is for archival purposes only.
| |
| | |
| ----
| |
| | |
| == A slightly narrow major sixth? ==
| |
| I think this is an absurd characterization. Shall we also call 3/2 a very slightly wide perfect fifth?
| |
| | |
| - '''genewardsmith''' September 29, 2011, 03:51:10 PM UTC-0700
| |
| ----
| |
| I am not attached to that characterization. "Narrow" is a relative term. I was thinking of the two major sixths that appear in the 5-limit, the other being 26/16. 5/3 is clearly the narrower. However, just to call it narrow without reference to anything is kind of silly, if not absurd as you say. So I'll go ahead and change it.
| |
| | |
| - '''Andrew_Heathwaite''' September 29, 2011, 03:59:12 PM UTC-0700
| |
| ----
| |