|
|
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| = ARCHIVED WIKISPACES DISCUSSION BELOW =
| | {{WSArchiveLink}} |
| '''All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.'''
| |
| ----
| |
| | |
| == Binary Music ==
| |
| Some wacky music ideas with 2-EDD?
| |
| | |
| Greetings !
| |
| | |
| - '''Osmiorisbendi''' April 14, 2017, 12:27:08 AM UTC-0700
| |
| ----
| |
| This actually gave me an idea for a composition, based on binary data representations of text! It'll be a while before I can actually render it though.
| |
| | |
| - '''kai.lugheidh''' April 15, 2017, 11:06:31 PM UTC-0700
| |
| ----
| |
| This actually gave me an idea for a composition, based on binary data representations of text! It'll be a while before I can actually render it though.
| |
| | |
| - '''kai.lugheidh''' April 15, 2017, 11:06:32 PM UTC-0700
| |
| ----
| |
| This is great. (and proves the value of having different people here) Maybe binary isn't such a good idea because only 2 sounds will probably be too boring, but taking some text and making noise from it may help to get decoupled from all that historic Tritonus palaver. I'm looking forward to hearing how this may sound!
| |
| | |
| - '''xenwolf''' April 16, 2017, 01:12:27 AM UTC-0700
| |
| ----
| |
| Maybe, for a machine, 2-EDD is enough for a inner musicalization of itself.
| |
| | |
| Maybe each name note is '0' and '0# = 0b' for this machine. All the time bi-tonic "tritonic". Crazy, but curious.
| |
| | |
| - '''Osmiorisbendi''' April 16, 2017, 02:22:50 AM UTC-0700
| |
| ----
| |
| Well, xenwolf, the barrenness of only having two sounds is kinda the point of the piece. And if that "historical Tritonus palaver" doesn't make old uptight conservative dorks mad, the content of the messages certainly will :P
| |
| | |
| Anyways, it's called "Dichotomy", and I've just edited in a link to it. Cheers.
| |
| | |
| - '''kai.lugheidh''' April 17, 2017, 12:43:56 PM UTC-0700
| |
| ----
| |