History and philosophy of xenharmonic music: Difference between revisions
m Protected "History and philosophy of xenharmonic music": semi-protected this page as high priority ([Edit=Allow only autoconfirmed users] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only autoconfirmed users] (indefinite)) |
m →Setting the Stage: it's -> its |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
Finally, key technological innovations provided the practical tools that allowed xenharmonic music to develop into an active and self-sustaining movement. Affordable power tools made it possible to build custom instruments and modify existing ones for new tuning systems. Cassette culture and photocopying enabled the low-cost distribution of recordings, tuning charts, and written theory, and the advances in the mail system led to the formation of network-based communities. This shift toward accessible, flexible tools and decentralized organization reflected the core values of xenharmonic music: independence, experimentation, and freedom from established systems. | Finally, key technological innovations provided the practical tools that allowed xenharmonic music to develop into an active and self-sustaining movement. Affordable power tools made it possible to build custom instruments and modify existing ones for new tuning systems. Cassette culture and photocopying enabled the low-cost distribution of recordings, tuning charts, and written theory, and the advances in the mail system led to the formation of network-based communities. This shift toward accessible, flexible tools and decentralized organization reflected the core values of xenharmonic music: independence, experimentation, and freedom from established systems. | ||
Xenharmonic music emerged not from a single idea, but from a set of overlapping conditions that made it both necessary and possible. The dominance of 12-EDO was established, while simultaneously questioned as just intonation, historical temperaments, and global tuning systems gained renewed attention. At the same time, the broader musical climate embraced experimentation and challenged inherited norms, and advances in technology empowered individuals to build instruments, create and share music, and form decentralized communities. These forces helped push xenharmonic music from the realm of theory into a practical and sustainable practice. Understanding these foundations is important in clarifying how the movement began and what has defined it from | Xenharmonic music emerged not from a single idea, but from a set of overlapping conditions that made it both necessary and possible. The dominance of 12-EDO was established, while simultaneously questioned as just intonation, historical temperaments, and global tuning systems gained renewed attention. At the same time, the broader musical climate embraced experimentation and challenged inherited norms, and advances in technology empowered individuals to build instruments, create and share music, and form decentralized communities. These forces helped push xenharmonic music from the realm of theory into a practical and sustainable practice. Understanding these foundations is important in clarifying how the movement began and what has defined it from its inception to the present day. | ||
=== Key Figures === | === Key Figures === | ||
| Line 130: | Line 130: | ||
[[Budjarn Lambeth]] | [[Budjarn Lambeth]] | ||
[[Jacob Barton]] | |||
''Note: These signatories signed the document [https://en.xen.wiki/index.php?title=History_and_philosophy_of_xenharmonic_music&oldid=210705 as it was on 24 Sep 2025].'' | ''Note: These signatories signed the document [https://en.xen.wiki/index.php?title=History_and_philosophy_of_xenharmonic_music&oldid=210705 as it was on 24 Sep 2025].'' | ||
[[Category:Essays]] | |||
[[Category:Overview]] | |||