Talk:5120/5103: Difference between revisions
Tristanbay (talk | contribs) |
Tristanbay (talk | contribs) Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
||
| (9 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown) | |||
| Line 46: | Line 46: | ||
:: Because "ess eight over ess nine" is too many syllables. [[User:Tristanbay|Tristanbay]] ([[User talk:Tristanbay|talk]]) 05:34, 17 February 2026 (UTC) | :: Because "ess eight over ess nine" is too many syllables. [[User:Tristanbay|Tristanbay]] ([[User talk:Tristanbay|talk]]) 05:34, 17 February 2026 (UTC) | ||
: I'm fine calling it saruyoma, y'all sort this out. --[[User:Eufalesio|Eufalesio]] ([[User talk:Eufalesio|talk]]) 10:04, 6 May 2026 (UTC) | |||
=== Petition to officialize ''aberschisma'', and change ''hemifamity'' to ''aberschismic'' === | |||
At this point, ''aberschisma'' and ''aberschismic'' seem like the most widely liked and used names in xenharmonic communities. Thereby I request ''aberschisma'' be set as the permanent, main name for 5120/5103, and ''hemifamity'' be officially changed to ''aberschismic''. | |||
Please put your "yes" or "no" and signature below. —[[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 05:56, 1 June 2026 (UTC) | |||
# '''Yes'''. —[[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 05:56, 1 June 2026 (UTC) | |||
# Yes, sure, why not. --[[User:Eufalesio|Eufalesio]] ([[User talk:Eufalesio|talk]]) 07:48, 1 June 2026 (UTC) | |||
# '''Yes''', I'm only weakly towards that name, but it feels alright, if the community wants it. --[[User:Overthink|Overthink]] ([[User talk:Overthink|talk]]) 15:40, 1 June 2026 (UTC) | |||
# '''Yes.''' [[User:Inthar|Inthar]] ([[User talk:Inthar|talk]]) 20:16, 1 June 2026 (UTC) | |||
# '''Yes'''. "Argentic" should still refer to the 2.3.7/5 subgroup temperament, however, per the change I made. --[[User:Lériendil|Lériendil]] ([[User talk:Lériendil|talk]]) 20:18, 1 June 2026 (UTC) | |||
# '''Yes''', I find it a lot more usefully descriptive. Hemififths and Amity are far from the main temperaments I associate with the comma, and Aberschismic comparatively describes quite well how I tend to use it (to equate 81/80~64/63 as a singular aberrisma) [[User:Unque|Unque]] ([[User talk:Unque|talk]]) 20:22, 1 June 2026 (UTC) | |||
# '''Yes'''. [[User:DotuXil|dotuXil]] <span style="color:#f50c7d">(i like microtones)</span> 21:41, 1 June 2026 (UTC) | |||
#'''Yes''', I'm ok with it in part since I was involved in coining the name [[User:Tristanbay|Tristanbay]] ([[User talk:Tristanbay|talk]]) 06:03, 3 June 2026 (UTC) | |||
: I was under the impression that "argent" won out in the community? – [[User:Sintel|Sintel🎏]] ([[User_talk:Sintel|talk]]) 12:30, 1 June 2026 (UTC) | |||
:: In my opinion it's a bit too confusing with the logarithmic argent tuning, even though it is closely related. --[[User:Overthink|Overthink]] ([[User talk:Overthink|talk]]) 15:40, 1 June 2026 (UTC) | |||
::: Seconded. --[[User:Lériendil|Lériendil]] ([[User talk:Lériendil|talk]]) 20:18, 1 June 2026 (UTC) | |||