User talk:Francium/647edo: Difference between revisions
→Deletion: this instead |
No edit summary |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Or maybe move to Francium's userspace. --[[User:Overthink|Overthink]] ([[User talk:Overthink|talk]]) 00:24, 13 May 2026 (UTC) | Or maybe move to Francium's userspace. --[[User:Overthink|Overthink]] ([[User talk:Overthink|talk]]) 00:24, 13 May 2026 (UTC) | ||
: I don't believe that simply having music written in it constitutes a reason to avoid deletion, particularly in cases such as this where it's extremely unclear how exactly the song uses the structures associated with the edo/tuning. 647 might as well just be an arbitrary number. --[[User:Lériendil|Lériendil]] ([[User talk:Lériendil|talk]]) 04:18, 14 May 2026 (UTC) | |||
:: Fair, I guess my point is that there's a thousand more pages that don't even meet this very meager standard. – [[User:Sintel|Sintel🎏]] ([[User_talk:Sintel|talk]]) 17:37, 14 May 2026 (UTC) | |||
I have moved the page into my user space to avoid deletion, I hope that's okay :). If there are any other pages I created which violate the notability guideline please tell me, so that I can move them into my user space too. [[User:Francium|Francium]] ([[User talk:Francium|talk]]) 10:59, 19 May 2026 (UTC) | |||