496edo: Difference between revisions
m Categories |
That "compound scale" is not really a temperament so moving accordingly |
||
| (7 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Infobox ET}} | |||
{{ED intro}} | |||
==Theory== | == Theory == | ||
496edo is [[enfactoring|enfactored]] in the 11-limit, with the same tuning as [[248edo]], but the [[patent val]]s differ on the mapping for 13. In the 13-limit patent val, it tempers out [[4225/4224]]. | |||
496edo is | |||
In the 2.3.11.19 subgroup, | 496edo is good with the 2.3.11.19 [[subgroup]]. For higher limits, it has good approximations of [[31/1|31]], [[37/1|37]], and [[47/1|47]]. In the 2.3.11.19 subgroup, it tempers out 131072/131043. | ||
=== Odd harmonics === | |||
{{Harmonics in equal|496}} | |||
=== Subsets and supersets === | |||
496 is the 3rd {{w|perfect number}}, factoring into {{factorization|496}}. Its nontrivial divisors are {{EDOs| 2, 4, 8, 16, 31, 62, 124, 248 }}, the most notable being 31. | |||
[[ | == Scales == | ||
Since 496edo is enfactored 248edo, in the 11-limit it can represent a [[compound scale|compound]] of two chains of 11-limit [[bischismic]] temperaments, interlaced. | |||