Talk:69edo: Difference between revisions

Wikispaces>FREEZE
No edit summary
 
→Inconsistency: Error between EDO interval and just interval is useful
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
= ARCHIVED WIKISPACES DISCUSSION BELOW =
{{WSArchiveLink}}
'''All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.'''
----


== Synch-Meantone ==
== Inconsistency ==
69edo's fifth is extremely close to that of "Synch-Meantone" in Scala, or Wilson equal beating meantone. Thought that was interesting.
In the proposed names section of the intervals, 7/5 is at 33 steps, while 10/7 is 35, and they sum up to 68 steps , not 69. This needs to be fixed ASAP.--[[User:Overthink|Overthink]] ([[User talk:Overthink|talk]]) 05:36, 13 November 2025 (UTC)


Perhaps someone could help figure out how perceptually "off" 69edo is from the real thing? Like, how long does it take for the beat-rates of the fifth and thirds to noticeably go out of sync..
: The table should go imo. Edos and edosteps don't need to be named anyway. [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 07:01, 13 November 2025 (UTC)


- '''kai.lugheidh''' September 23, 2017, 10:21:39 PM UTC-0700
:: The table does have a useful idea (even if the particular implementation in this case is buggy), in that it gives the error between the just interval and the EDO interval. This is something that most other interval tables should do, but do not.  [[User:Lucius Chiaraviglio|Lucius Chiaraviglio]] ([[User talk:Lucius Chiaraviglio|talk]]) 13:39, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
----
Return to "69edo" page.