User:Aura/Aura's introduction to 159edo: Difference between revisions
Removed suspensions from the charts, as such chords are not considered basic- perhaps I'll cover those in a separate section. |
Fixed notation error in chart |
||
(27 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
== Intervals and Notation == | == Intervals and Notation == | ||
159edo contains all the intervals of 53edo, however, as some of the interpretations differ due 159edo having different mappings for certain primes, those differences show up in how harmonies are constructed. Furthermore, just as with 24edo can be thought of as essentially having two fields of 12edo separated by a quartertone, 159edo can be thought of as having three fields of 53edo, each separated from the others by a third of a 53edo step on either side. This even lends to 159edo having its own variation on the [[Dinner Party Rules]]—represented here by the Harmonic Compatibility Rating and Melodic Compatibility Rating columns where 10 is a full-blown friend relative to the root and −10 if a full-blown enemy relative to the root. Note that the Harmonic Compatibility and Melodic Compatibility ratings are based on octave-equivalence, and that some of the ratings are still speculative. | 159edo contains all the intervals of [[53edo]], however, as some of the interpretations differ due 159edo having different mappings for certain primes, those differences show up in how harmonies are constructed. Furthermore, just as with 24edo can be thought of as essentially having two fields of 12edo separated by a quartertone, 159edo can be thought of as having three fields of 53edo, each separated from the others by a third of a 53edo step on either side. This even lends to 159edo having its own variation on the [[Dinner Party Rules]]—represented here by the Harmonic Compatibility Rating and Melodic Compatibility Rating columns where 10 is a full-blown friend relative to the root and −10 if a full-blown enemy relative to the root. Note that the Harmonic Compatibility and Melodic Compatibility ratings are based on octave-equivalence, and that some of the ratings are still speculative. | ||
{| class="mw-collapsible mw-collapsed wikitable center-1" | {| class="mw-collapsible mw-collapsed wikitable center-1" | ||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
! rowspan="2" | Step | ! rowspan="2" | Step | ||
! rowspan="2" | Cents | ! rowspan="2" | Cents | ||
! | ! colspan="3" | Interval and Note names | ||
! colspan="2" | Compatibility rating | ! colspan="2" | Compatibility rating | ||
|- | |- | ||
! [[SKULO interval names|SKULO]]-based interval names | |||
! [[2.3-equivalent class and Pythagorean-commatic interval naming system|Pythagorean-commatic]]-based interval names | |||
! [[Syntonic-rastmic subchroma notation|SRS notation]] | |||
! Harmonic | ! Harmonic | ||
! Melodic | ! Melodic | ||
Line 524: | Line 527: | ||
| k4 | | k4 | ||
| Greater Grave Fourth | | Greater Grave Fourth | ||
| G↓ | | G↓, Abb | ||
| -6 | | -6 | ||
| -5 | | -5 | ||
Line 620: | Line 623: | ||
| kkA4, RuA4, kd5 | | kkA4, RuA4, kd5 | ||
| Diptolemaic Augmented Fourth, Retroptolemaic Diminished Fifth | | Diptolemaic Augmented Fourth, Retroptolemaic Diminished Fifth | ||
| G#↓↓, Ab↓ | | Gt>/, G#↓↓, Ab↓ | ||
| -3 | | -3 | ||
| 4 | | 4 | ||
Line 692: | Line 695: | ||
| KKd5, rUDd5, KA4 | | KKd5, rUDd5, KA4 | ||
| Diptolemaic Diminished Fifth, Retroptolemaic Augmented Fourth | | Diptolemaic Diminished Fifth, Retroptolemaic Augmented Fourth | ||
| Ab↑↑, G#↑ | | Ad<\, Ab↑↑, G#↑ | ||
| -3 | | -3 | ||
| 4 | | 4 | ||
Line 716: | Line 719: | ||
| Rm5, rUA4 | | Rm5, rUA4 | ||
| Wide Paraminor Fifth, Retrodiptolemaic Augmented Fourth | | Wide Paraminor Fifth, Retrodiptolemaic Augmented Fourth | ||
| Ad | | Ad>/, G#↑, Ab↑↑ | ||
| -1 | | -1 | ||
| 6 | | 6 | ||
Line 788: | Line 791: | ||
| K5 | | K5 | ||
| Lesser Acute Fifth | | Lesser Acute Fifth | ||
| A↑ | | A↑, Gx | ||
| -6 | | -6 | ||
| -5 | | -5 | ||
Line 1,004: | Line 1,007: | ||
| KM6 | | KM6 | ||
| Lesser Supermajor Sixth | | Lesser Supermajor Sixth | ||
| B↑, Cd<\, Cb↑↑, | | B↑, Cd<\, Cb↑↑, Ax | ||
| -1 | | -1 | ||
| 7 | | 7 | ||
Line 1,012: | Line 1,015: | ||
| SM6, kUM6 | | SM6, kUM6 | ||
| Greater Supermajor Second, Narrow Inframinor Seventh | | Greater Supermajor Second, Narrow Inframinor Seventh | ||
| | | Cd<, Bt<↓, B↑/ | ||
| 0 | | 0 | ||
| 7 | | 7 | ||
Line 1,299: | Line 1,302: | ||
== 5-limit diatonic music == | == 5-limit diatonic music == | ||
Although 159edo inherits | Although 159edo inherits 53edo's close approximations of both the [[5-limit]] Zarlino scale and the [[3-limit]] [[diatonic]] MOS, these are not the only scales that one can use for fixed-pitch diatonic music even in that system. In fact, both of them are less than optimal for many facets of traditional Western classical music, seeing as for the most part, each of the traditional diatonic modes has its own optimized scale in the 5-limit. The reason for this is that in non-meantone 5-limit systems, one inevitably has to deal with the ~[[40/27]] wolf fifth and the ~[[27/20]] wolf fourth, and there's only two ideal positions in the scale for those intervals to be situated in fixed-pitch diatonic music. For major modes, the ~27/20 wolf fourth is ideally situated between the ~[[5/4]] major third and the ~[[27/16]] major sixth, while for the minor modes and the diatonic blighted mode Locrian, the ~40/27 wolf fifth is ideally situated between the ~[[6/5]] minor third and the ~[[16/9]] minor seventh. Not only that, but it also pays to distinguish the Pythagorean major and minor thirds from their Ptolemaic counterparts as both types of major and minor third have distinct roles to play in the 5-limit diatonic music. | ||
=== Scales and Harmony === | === Scales and Harmony === | ||
Line 1,413: | Line 1,416: | ||
|} | |} | ||
As a consequence of this particular scale structure, you have the following basic chords | As a consequence of this particular scale structure, you have the following basic chords... | ||
{| class="mw-collapsible mw-collapsed wikitable center-1" | {| class="mw-collapsible mw-collapsed wikitable center-1" | ||
Line 1,435: | Line 1,438: | ||
| D, F↑, A | | D, F↑, A | ||
| 0, 42, 93 | | 0, 42, 93 | ||
| | | ↓III | ||
| 1/(4:5:6) | | 1/(4:5:6) | ||
| This is the second of two triads that can be considered fully-resolved in Western Classical Harmony | | This is the second of two triads that can be considered fully-resolved in Western Classical Harmony | ||
Line 1,463: | Line 1,466: | ||
| D, F↑, Ab↑ | | D, F↑, Ab↑ | ||
| 0, 42, 81 | | 0, 42, 81 | ||
| | | ↓VII | ||
| 45:54:64 | | 45:54:64 | ||
| This dissonant triad is one of two possible diatonic diminished triads in the 5-limit | | This dissonant triad is one of two possible diatonic diminished triads in the 5-limit | ||
Line 1,511: | Line 1,514: | ||
| V | | V | ||
| 36:45:54:64 | | 36:45:54:64 | ||
| This tetrad is | | This tetrad is one of two main dominant-seventh-type chords in the 5-limit, tonicizing the note located at ~3/2 below its root | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Supradusthumic Pythagorean Minor Seventh | | Supradusthumic Pythagorean Minor Seventh | ||
Line 1,520: | Line 1,523: | ||
| This dissonant tetrad is one of a few diatonic tetrads to feature a wolf fifth | | This dissonant tetrad is one of a few diatonic tetrads to feature a wolf fifth | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | | Ptolemaic Half-Diminished | ||
| D, F↑, Ab↑, C↑ | | D, F↑, Ab↑, C↑ | ||
| 0, 42, 81, 135 | | 0, 42, 81, 135 | ||
| VII | | VII | ||
| 45:54:64:81 | | 45:54:64:81 | ||
| This dissonant tetrad is an | | This dissonant tetrad is an option for imperfect half cadences in the 5-limit | ||
|} | |} | ||
With the above scale steps and chords, this variation of Ionian in 159edo is considerably more tonally stable than its more familiar counterpart from 12edo and 24edo. | With the above scale steps and chords, this variation of Ionian in 159edo is considerably more tonally stable than its more familiar counterpart from 12edo and 24edo. It is also one of only two traditional diatonic modes in which one is able to perform a complete [[Wikipedia: Vi–ii–V–I|circle progression]]. | ||
==== Dorian ==== | |||
Unlike what is expected, the form of Dorian mode optimized for 5-limit is not symmetrical, owing to the need to maintain [[Rothenberg propriety]]. | |||
{| class="mw-collapsible mw-collapsed wikitable center-1" | |||
|+ style="font-size: 105%; white-space: nowrap;" | Table of Dorian notes and intervals | |||
|- | |||
! Interval Name | |||
! Notation (from D) | |||
! Steps from Tonic | |||
! Function | |||
! Corresponding JI | |||
|- | |||
| Perfect Unison | |||
| D | |||
| 0 | |||
| Tonic | |||
| [[1/1]] | |||
|- | |||
| Pythagorean Major Second | |||
| E | |||
| 27 | |||
| Supertonic (Bidominant) | |||
| [[9/8]] | |||
|- | |||
| Ptolemaic Minor Third | |||
| F↑ | |||
| 42 | |||
| Mesoproximomediant | |||
| [[6/5]] | |||
|- | |||
| Perfect Fourth | |||
| G | |||
| 66 | |||
| Servient (Subdominant) | |||
| [[4/3]] | |||
|- | |||
| Perfect Fifth | |||
| A | |||
| 93 | |||
| Dominant | |||
| [[3/2]] | |||
|- | |||
| Pythagorean Major Sixth | |||
| B | |||
| 120 | |||
| Proximocontramediant (Tridominant) | |||
| [[27/16]] | |||
|- | |||
| Pythagorean Minor Seventh | |||
| C | |||
| 132 | |||
| Subtonic (Biservient) | |||
| [[16/9]] | |||
|- | |||
| Perfect Octave | |||
| D | |||
| 159 | |||
| Tonic | |||
| [[2/1]] | |||
|} | |||
As a consequence of this particular scale structure, you have the following basic chords... | |||
{| class="mw-collapsible mw-collapsed wikitable center-1" | |||
|+ style="font-size: 105%; white-space: nowrap;" | Table of basic Dorian triads | |||
|- | |||
! Name | |||
! Notation (from D) | |||
! Steps | |||
! Occur(s) on Scale Degree(s) | |||
! Approximate JI | |||
! Notes | |||
|- | |||
| Ptolemaic Minor | |||
| D, F↑, A | |||
| 0, 42, 93 | |||
| I | |||
| 1/(4:5:6) | |||
| This is the second of two triads that can be considered fully-resolved in Western Classical Harmony | |||
|- | |||
| Pythagorean Major | |||
| D, F#, A | |||
| 0, 54, 93 | |||
| IV, bVII | |||
| 1/(54:64:81) | |||
| This dissonant triad is common in Western Classical, Medieval, and Neo-Medieval Harmony | |||
|- | |||
| Pythagorean Minor | |||
| D, F, A | |||
| 0, 39, 93 | |||
| II, V | |||
| 54:64:81 | |||
| This dissonant triad is common in Western Classical, Medieval, and Neo-Medieval Harmony | |||
|- | |||
| Supradusthumic Ptolemaic Major | |||
| D, F#↓, A↓ | |||
| 0, 51, 90 | |||
| b↑III | |||
| 1/(27:32:40) | |||
| This dissonant triad is one of two possible diatonic wolf triads in the 5-limit | |||
|- | |||
| Lesser Ptolemaic Diminished | |||
| D, F, Ab↑ | |||
| 0, 39, 81 | |||
| VI | |||
| 1/(45:54:64) | |||
| This dissonant triad is one of two possible diatonic diminished triads in the 5-limit | |||
|} | |||
{| class="mw-collapsible mw-collapsed wikitable center-1" | |||
|+ style="font-size: 105%; white-space: nowrap;" | Table of basic Dorian tetrads | |||
|- | |||
! Name | |||
! Notation (from D) | |||
! Steps | |||
! Occur(s) on Scale Degree(s) | |||
! Approximate JI | |||
! Notes | |||
|- | |||
| Ptolemaic Minor with Pythagorean Minor Seventh | |||
| D, F↑, A, C | |||
| 0, 42, 93, 132 | |||
| I | |||
| 90:108:135:160 | |||
| This dissonant tetrad is perhaps best considered a cross between a suspension and a triad owing to the dissonance of the wolf fifth | |||
|- | |||
| Pythagorean Major Seventh | |||
| D, F#, A, C# | |||
| 0, 54, 93, 147 | |||
| bVII | |||
| 128:162:192:243 | |||
| This dissonant tetrad is common in 3-limit music, but still has a role to play in 5-limit music | |||
|- | |||
| Pythagorean Minor Seventh | |||
| D, F, A, C | |||
| 0, 39, 93, 132 | |||
| II, V | |||
| 54:64:81:96 | |||
| This dissonant tetrad is common in 3-limit music, but still has a role to play in 5-limit music | |||
|- | |||
| Supradusthumic Ptolemaic Major Seventh | |||
| D, F#↓, A↓, C#↓ | |||
| 0, 51, 90, 144 | |||
| b↑III | |||
| 240:256:320:405 | |||
| This dissonant tetrad is one of a few diatonic tetrads to feature a wolf fifth | |||
|- | |||
| Ptolemaic Parallel Dominant Seventh | |||
| D, F#, A, C↑ | |||
| 0, 54, 93, 135 | |||
| IV | |||
| 1/(45:54:64:81) | |||
| This tetrad is one of two main dominant-seventh-type chords in the 5-limit, tonicizing the note located at ~9/8 above its root | |||
|- | |||
| Ptolemaic Parallel Half-Diminished | |||
| D, F, Ab↑, C | |||
| 0, 39, 81, 132 | |||
| VI | |||
| 1/(36:45:54:64) | |||
| This dissonant tetrad is an option for imperfect half cadences in the 5-limit | |||
|} | |||
With the above scale steps and chords, this variation of Dorian in 159edo has a few noteworthy tricks- especially once one considers suspensions, which will have to be covered later in this document. | |||
==== Phrygian ==== | |||
This mode is optimized for 5-limit using a variation on the left-handed Zarlino diatonic scale. | |||
{| class="mw-collapsible mw-collapsed wikitable center-1" | |||
|+ style="font-size: 105%; white-space: nowrap;" | Table of Phrygian notes and intervals | |||
|- | |||
! Interval Name | |||
! Notation (from D) | |||
! Steps from Tonic | |||
! Function | |||
! Corresponding JI | |||
|- | |||
| Perfect Unison | |||
| D | |||
| 0 | |||
| Tonic | |||
| [[1/1]] | |||
|- | |||
| Ptolemaic Minor Second | |||
| Eb↑ | |||
| 15 | |||
| Distosupercollocant | |||
| [[16/15]] | |||
|- | |||
| Ptolemaic Minor Third | |||
| F↑ | |||
| 42 | |||
| Mesoproximomediant | |||
| [[6/5]] | |||
|- | |||
| Perfect Fourth | |||
| G | |||
| 66 | |||
| Servient (Subdominant) | |||
| [[4/3]] | |||
|- | |||
| Perfect Fifth | |||
| A | |||
| 93 | |||
| Dominant | |||
| [[3/2]] | |||
|- | |||
| Ptolemaic Minor Sixth | |||
| Bb↑ | |||
| 108 | |||
| Mesodistocontramediant | |||
| [[8/5]] | |||
|- | |||
| Pythagorean Minor Seventh | |||
| C | |||
| 132 | |||
| Subtonic (Biservient) | |||
| [[16/9]] | |||
|- | |||
| Perfect Octave | |||
| D | |||
| 159 | |||
| Tonic | |||
| [[2/1]] | |||
|} | |||
As a consequence of this particular scale structure, you have the following basic chords... | |||
{| class="mw-collapsible mw-collapsed wikitable center-1" | |||
|+ style="font-size: 105%; white-space: nowrap;" | Table of basic Phrygian triads | |||
|- | |||
! Name | |||
! Notation (from D) | |||
! Steps | |||
! Occur(s) on Scale Degree(s) | |||
! Approximate JI | |||
! Notes | |||
|- | |||
| Ptolemaic Major | |||
| D, F#↓, A | |||
| 0, 51, 93 | |||
| b↑II, b↑VI | |||
| 4:5:6 | |||
| This is the first of two triads that can be considered fully-resolved in Western Classical Harmony | |||
|- | |||
| Ptolemaic Minor | |||
| D, F↑, A | |||
| 0, 42, 93 | |||
| I, IV, bVII | |||
| 1/(4:5:6) | |||
| This is the second of two triads that can be considered fully-resolved in Western Classical Harmony | |||
|- | |||
| Supradusthumic Ptolemaic Major | |||
| D, F#↓, A↓ | |||
| 0, 51, 90 | |||
| b↑III | |||
| 1/(27:32:40) | |||
| This dissonant triad is one of two possible diatonic wolf triads in the 5-limit | |||
|- | |||
| Lesser Ptolemaic Diminished | |||
| D, F, Ab↑ | |||
| 0, 39, 81 | |||
| V | |||
| 1/(45:54:64) | |||
| This dissonant triad is one of two possible diatonic diminished triads in the 5-limit | |||
|} | |||
{| class="mw-collapsible mw-collapsed wikitable center-1" | |||
|+ style="font-size: 105%; white-space: nowrap;" | Table of basic Phrygian tetrads | |||
|- | |||
! Name | |||
! Notation (from D) | |||
! Steps | |||
! Occur(s) on Scale Degree(s) | |||
! Approximate JI | |||
! Notes | |||
|- | |||
| Ptolemaic Minor with Pythagorean Minor Seventh | |||
| D, F↑, A, C | |||
| 0, 42, 93, 132 | |||
| I | |||
| 90:108:135:160 | |||
| This dissonant tetrad is perhaps best considered a cross between a suspension and a triad owing to the dissonance of the wolf fifth | |||
|- | |||
| Ptolemaic Major Seventh | |||
| D, F#↓, A, C#↓ | |||
| 0, 51, 93, 144 | |||
| b↑II | |||
| 8:10:12:15 | |||
| This tetrad is likely to decompose into a voicing variation on the corresponding triad if the same scale degree is used as a chord root multiple times in a row | |||
|- | |||
| Supradusthumic Ptolemaic Dominant Seventh | |||
| D, F#↓, A↓, C | |||
| 0, 51, 90, 132 | |||
| b↑III | |||
| 1/(45:54:64:80) | |||
| This dissonant dominant tetrad has a different function than its more traditional counterpart | |||
|} | |||