Talk:Kees semi-height: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m →Getting the point (call for better examples): addition |
|||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
| Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
Thanks for having a look! --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 16:09, 18 May 2020 (UTC) | Thanks for having a look! --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 16:09, 18 May 2020 (UTC) | ||
: These (and more) examples are added in the article. I have read the text several times in the meantime and I think there is no longer any doubt about its meaning. Thanks again for your time, --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 21:32, 18 May 2020 (UTC) | : These (and more) examples are added in the article. I have read the text several times in the meantime and I think there is no longer any doubt about its meaning. Thanks again for your time, --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 21:32, 18 May 2020 (UTC) | ||
== Merge with odd-limit == | |||
This is literally the same thing. – [[User:Sintel|Sintel🎏]] ([[User_talk:Sintel|talk]]) 18:20, 3 May 2025 (UTC) | |||
: Agreed. That implies keeping other terms like "Kees expressibility", for which I wonder if there are also equivalent terms around. --[[User:Fredg999|Fredg999]] ([[User talk:Fredg999|talk]]) 21:59, 3 May 2025 (UTC) | |||
:: Thinking about this, the same thing could be said about [[Weil height]] and [[integer limit]], although the latter doesn't have a seperate page. | |||
:: Not sure how to go about this symmetry. I'd rather keep Weil height as it is, since the various generalizations of it are quite useful 'integer limit' isn't used that often compared to odd limit. – [[User:Sintel|Sintel🎏]] ([[User_talk:Sintel|talk]]) 23:02, 3 May 2025 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 23:02, 3 May 2025
|
This page also contains archived Wikispaces discussion. |
Getting the point (call for better examples)
Is the Kees Height correct for the followinf examples?
| Interval | Kees Height | Deduction steps |
|---|---|---|
| 9/5 | 9 | max(9, 5) → 9 |
| 10/9 | 9 | 10/9 → 5/9; max(5, 9) → 9 |
| 15/14 | 15 | 15/14 → 15/7; max(15, 7) → 15 |
| 28/15 | 15 | 28/15 → 7/15; max(7, 15) → 15 |
Thanks for having a look! --Xenwolf (talk) 16:09, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
- These (and more) examples are added in the article. I have read the text several times in the meantime and I think there is no longer any doubt about its meaning. Thanks again for your time, --Xenwolf (talk) 21:32, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Merge with odd-limit
This is literally the same thing. – Sintel🎏 (talk) 18:20, 3 May 2025 (UTC)
- Agreed. That implies keeping other terms like "Kees expressibility", for which I wonder if there are also equivalent terms around. --Fredg999 (talk) 21:59, 3 May 2025 (UTC)
- Thinking about this, the same thing could be said about Weil height and integer limit, although the latter doesn't have a seperate page.
- Not sure how to go about this symmetry. I'd rather keep Weil height as it is, since the various generalizations of it are quite useful 'integer limit' isn't used that often compared to odd limit. – Sintel🎏 (talk) 23:02, 3 May 2025 (UTC)