User:Moremajorthanmajor/United Kingdom of Musical Instruments: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
m {{worldbuilding}} |
||
| (6 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{worldbuilding}} | |||
Notice: Even though this topic is from a fictional world based on real types of musical instruments which have human lives, no terminology given here is to confused with legitimate proposals of how to talk about any musical practice in the real world. | Notice: Even though this topic is from a fictional world based on real types of musical instruments which have human lives, no terminology given here is to confused with legitimate proposals of how to talk about any musical practice in the real world. | ||
| Line 16: | Line 18: | ||
|Sol♯ | |Sol♯ | ||
|*11 | |*11 | ||
|Augmented eleventh, eighteenth | |Augmented eleventh, eighteenth | ||
|- | |- | ||
|5 fifths | |5 fifths | ||
| Line 82: | Line 84: | ||
|La♭ | |La♭ | ||
|*11 | |*11 | ||
|Diminished twelfth, nineteenth | |Diminished twelfth, nineteenth | ||
|} | |} | ||
At the time the modal system was new, it was widespread, but not absolute, that only the true relations for the first three steps from the octave on the chain of fifths, and thus the 2.3.7.19.43 subgroup, were considered strictly in-bounds, thus it is that the modal system is considered to classify Re as natural. Major is considered as comparable to La as minor is to Sol, but La ''superparticularis'' and La ''superpartiens'' never saw as widespread usage as Fa ''superpartiens'' before the conversion of the latter to flats'','' Sol ''superparticularis'' and Sol ''superpartiens'' never seeing serious usage as they unnecessarily complicated notation. The paradox of this is that the true relations, only they and the tritone being considered to have distinct desired (sub)harmonics, generally do not have the same ones for ''fortis'' and ''lenis'', beside which the weakness of ''lenis'' is that its desired (sub)harmonics mostly form [[wolf interval]]<nowiki/>s. To solve this problem, theorists quickly created the [[User:Moremajorthanmajor/United Kingdom of Musical Instruments/List of m/n-comma mean | At the time the modal system was new, it was widespread, but not absolute, that only the true relations for the first three steps from the octave on the chain of fifths, and thus the 2.3.7.19.43 subgroup, were considered strictly in-bounds, thus it is that the modal system is considered to classify Re as natural. Major is considered as comparable to La as minor is to Sol, but La ''superparticularis'' and La ''superpartiens'' never saw as widespread usage as Fa ''superpartiens'' before the conversion of the latter to flats'','' Sol ''superparticularis'' and Sol ''superpartiens'' never seeing serious usage as they unnecessarily complicated notation. The paradox of this is that the true relations, only they and the tritone being considered to have distinct desired (sub)harmonics, generally do not have the same ones for ''fortis'' and ''lenis'', beside which the weakness of ''lenis'' is that its desired (sub)harmonics mostly form [[wolf interval]]<nowiki/>s. To solve this problem, theorists quickly created the [[User:Moremajorthanmajor/United Kingdom of Musical Instruments/List of m/n-comma mean minor triads|mean minor mode]] with a flexible sixth, which is primarily considered to apply temperament, especially of a superparticular interval of the 2.3.5.7.11.13.17.19.43 subgroup up to [[28/27]] such as [[129/128]] or [[136/135]], directly to the fourth. | ||
[[Category:Worldbuilding]] | |||