Sinarabian comma: Difference between revisions

Aura (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Aura (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 15: Line 15:
The name of this comma comes from a portmanteau of "Ibn Sina" and "Alpharabian", and was given by [[Aura]] on the basis of a series of connections between intervals that he found and shared with [[Margo Schulter]], who took note of the following implications, here paraphrased in part by Aura.
The name of this comma comes from a portmanteau of "Ibn Sina" and "Alpharabian", and was given by [[Aura]] on the basis of a series of connections between intervals that he found and shared with [[Margo Schulter]], who took note of the following implications, here paraphrased in part by Aura.


One of the major commatic relations is between the rastma (243/242) on one hand, which occurs in the tuning of the mode of Zalzal by [[Wikipedia: al-Farabi|al-Farabi]] (c. 870-950) as the distinction between his steps of [[12/11]] (150.637c) and the smaller 88/81 (143.498c), and, on the other hand, the major minthma (352/351, 4.925c) described by [[Wikipedia: Avicenna|Ibn Sina]] (c.980-1037) in noting the "resemblance" between certain complex superpartient ratios and nearby simpler superparticular ratios, e.g. 128/117 (155.562c) and the simpler 12/11, or 88/81 and the simpler 13/12 (138.573c).  These comparisons relate to the adjacent intervals included in the [[tetrachords]] al-Farabi and Ibn Sina favor to realize the 'oudist Mansur Zalzal's tuning favoring a middle third:
One of the major commatic relations is between the rastma (243/242) on one hand, which occurs in the tuning of the mode of Zalzal by [[Wikipedia: al-Farabi|al-Farabi]] (c. 870-950) as the distinction between his steps of [[12/11]] (150.637c) and the smaller 88/81 (143.498c), and, on the other hand, the major minthma (352/351, 4.925c) described by [[Wikipedia: Avicenna|Ibn Sina]] (c.980-1037) in noting the "resemblance" between certain complex superpartient ratios and nearby simpler superparticular ratios, e.g. 128/117 (155.562c) and the simpler 12/11, or 88/81 and the simpler 13/12 (138.573c).  These comparisons relate to the adjacent intervals included in the [[tetrachord]]s al-Farabi and Ibn Sina favor to realize the 'oudist Mansur Zalzal's tuning favoring a middle third:


Al-Farabi:   
Al-Farabi: